Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 189:
Line 189: − − ==Proposed Block Policy== − There has recently been some disagreement over blocks, so I have created a [[User:CPAdmin1/Proposed Block Policy|proposed block policy]] − Tell me what you think. --[[User:CPAdmin1|CPAdmin1]] 23:23, 12 April 2007 (EDT) − − ==Look at the content== − It was discussion, not an article. [[User:AL|AL]] 17:07, 19 April 2007 (EDT) − − Sorry, I thought that was what the discussion page was for, I won't redelete if you put it back. [[User:AL|AL]] 17:22, 19 April 2007 (EDT) − − :We aren't very well organized. That was the AFD page for the [[Adultery]] article. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 17:23, 19 April 2007 (EDT) − − ==Rschlafly== − − Ed, can you do anything to ban Rschalfy? He keeps making the [[Adultery]] page say that Adultery is when a womwn sleeps with a man. It's ridiculous gender bias, and as a victim of the exact opposite happening to me, you can see why I'm so upset abou this utterly laughable article. [[User:50something|50something]] − − *You are talking about Andy's brother? You think Ed can ban him? Maybe vitamins would help you. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 23:05, 21 April 2007 (EDT) − − Ed - RSchallfy just reverted the [[Adultery]] page despite some recent excellent edits to his own absurd, backwards version, then locked it. If that isn't reason for banning this moron, I don't know what is. 50something. − − *I don't think you can read, 50something. RSchalfly is an Administrator here, Ed cannot remove him. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 04:25, 23 April 2007 (EDT) − − I don't care ''who'' he knows. He is not exactly an "asset" to this site. Can the <s>cabal</s> Panel address the issue? Surely Andrew can find something else for him to do besides damage his web site? [[User:Human|Human]] 02:55, 25 April 2007 (EDT) − − ==Zugstein== − − As real as anything in ''Rise and Fall of the Third Reich'' I guess. I'll check the spelling tonight. [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 12:17, 30 April 2007 (EDT) − − :If that is the book I think it is, maybe the info never got posted online. Dead-tree materials are valid, just harder to check. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:18, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
moving some discussion threads
My only worry about Conservapedia is that it '''might''' make the equal and opposite mistake; it has certainly been accused of it, hundreds of times. But senior staff have been amazingly tolerant of opposing ideas here so far and I reason to hope they will continue to do so.
My only worry about Conservapedia is that it '''might''' make the equal and opposite mistake; it has certainly been accused of it, hundreds of times. But senior staff have been amazingly tolerant of opposing ideas here so far and I reason to hope they will continue to do so.