Changes
/* Example 1 */ any assertion made can be supported
I fail to see what the problem is here, yes the citation had an most likely unintentional spelling error on it, if that is the problem, why not just correct it, no need to remove all of the content. Allso American Psychological Association and American Psychiatric Association seam to share the same opininnion that reparative therapy isn't usually helpfull, on the contrary it's usually harmfull [http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/justthefacts.html] So i see even less reason to over react to this error. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 13:58, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
:Correction was done, and as stated above, The editor understands the issues, which is not an unqualified statement and I can ''personally'' attest to. What flowed from that "errant' citation was a whole series of faulty, and deceptive refereences and editing. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:42, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
==Example 2==
