Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 38: Line 38:  
:Correction was done, and as stated above, the editor understands the issues, which is not an unqualified statement and I can ''personally'' attest to.  What flowed from that "errant" citation was a whole series of faulty, and deceptive references and editing.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:42, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:Correction was done, and as stated above, the editor understands the issues, which is not an unqualified statement and I can ''personally'' attest to.  What flowed from that "errant" citation was a whole series of faulty, and deceptive references and editing.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:42, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
   −
::By going thro the page history im quite baffled, what series of faulty and deceptive refrences and editing do you mean? This article only has few edits and only one even touching the whole subject is you deleting it. This all makes one wonder what your true motivations where. Either way, i take you don't then oppose me adding that information again with small modifications and the right citation? [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 15:59, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
+
::After going thro the page history im quite baffled, what series of faulty and deceptive refrences and editing do you mean? This article only has few edits and only one even touching the whole subject is you when deleting AmesG:s edits. This all makes one wonder what your true motivations where. Either way, i take you don't then oppose me adding that information again with small modifications and the right citation? [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 15:59, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
    
==Example 2==
 
==Example 2==
188

edits

Navigation menu