Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,551
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: − +
→top: Spelling, Grammar, and General Cleanup
{{cquote|Accordingly, we hold that the interpretation of the word "inventory" in this case is an issue for the judge, not the jury, and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.}}
{{cquote|Accordingly, we hold that the interpretation of the word "inventory" in this case is an issue for the judge, not the jury, and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.}}
''Markman v. Westview Instruments'', 517 U.S. 370, 391, 116 S. Ct. 1384, 1396 (1996).
''Markman v. Westview Instruments'', 517 U.S. 370, 391, 116 S. Ct. 1384, 1396 (1996).
[[category:Patent Law]]
[[Category:Patent Law]]