2,732
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + + +
Conservapedia talk:Tolerance (view source)
Revision as of 21:16, April 30, 2007
, 21:16, April 30, 2007no edit summary
Ed's got the main objection nailed. But "acceptance" of homosexuality isn't at issue. Gay rights activists don't want you to think that being gay is "good," just that it's not "bad" enough to merit civil condemnation.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 16:54, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
Ed's got the main objection nailed. But "acceptance" of homosexuality isn't at issue. Gay rights activists don't want you to think that being gay is "good," just that it's not "bad" enough to merit civil condemnation.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 16:54, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
== Need Help with Hateful Articles ==
I don't have the time to correct these all, but any enterprising editor willing to tackle the prejudiced statements in the current versions of [[homophobia]], [[homosexuality]], and [[reparative therapy]] would have my eternal gratitude.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 17:16, 30 April 2007 (EDT)