Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:  
:I removed the info. I don't see why we need to note it there, especially due to the disagreement over its accuracy. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:04, 1 August 2017 (EDT)
 
:I removed the info. I don't see why we need to note it there, especially due to the disagreement over its accuracy. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:04, 1 August 2017 (EDT)
 
::I see that the claim that Weidel is bisexual has been reinserted, first by TrueTory and then removed but subsequently replaced by 1990'sguy. Is there some new information that supports the accuracy of that claim that was not present in August? For the record, I believe she identifies herself as a lesbian. If her sexuality is pertinent, why is she being described as bisexual?--[[User:Brossa|Brossa]] ([[User talk:Brossa|talk]]) 17:25, 25 September 2017 (EDT)
 
::I see that the claim that Weidel is bisexual has been reinserted, first by TrueTory and then removed but subsequently replaced by 1990'sguy. Is there some new information that supports the accuracy of that claim that was not present in August? For the record, I believe she identifies herself as a lesbian. If her sexuality is pertinent, why is she being described as bisexual?--[[User:Brossa|Brossa]] ([[User talk:Brossa|talk]]) 17:25, 25 September 2017 (EDT)
 +
:::I completely forgot about this talk page discussion. Thanks for reminding me, Brossa. I don't think there has been any change since August, and after reviewing it again, I think my original position of keeping the mention out is correct (at least for now -- if we create an article for Weidel, we can include her sexuality, or ''possibly'' if we find a good source that accurately describes her sexuality).
 +
:::Unrelated to the above, I found a good source arguing that the AfD is a conservative party: [http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/why-the-conservative-afd-party-did-so-well-in-the-german-elections/article/2635515] While an opinion article, I find the arguments to be good, and the ''Washington Examiner'' is by no means an "alt-right" or etc. publication, so if they allow an op-ed writer state this position, I find the position more believable. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:25, 25 September 2017 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035

edits

Navigation menu