| Line 1,154: |
Line 1,154: |
| | |2001 | | |2001 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |Another film released during the [[Michael Eisner]] era of [[Disney]]. The film has a Military Commander as the bad guy who would endanger the city of Atlantis just to be rich, with it also being implied that he was going to commit treason by selling the power source to the Kaiser during World War I for the same motivation. Simply having an adventure movie in Atlantis is just too much to ask I guess. | + | |Released during the [[Michael Eisner]] era of [[Disney]], a military commander is the main villain who would endanger the lost city of Atlantis just to be rich, and it is implied that he would commit treason by selling the power source to the Kaiser during World War I for the same motivation. |
| | |$84,056,472 | | |$84,056,472 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,160: |
Line 1,160: |
| | |2006 | | |2006 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |This pro-communist film's main message of the power of the individual to be more powerful than one another is a bad thing. Also, the exterminator is clearly being shown in negative light for simply doing his job, as he is the main villain of the film and it promotes environmentalism as well. | + | |This pro-communist film's main message of the power of the individual to be more powerful than one another is a bad thing. The exterminator, apparently the main antagonist, is vilified for simply doing his job, thus giving the animation an environmentalist message. |
| | |$28,142,535 | | |$28,142,535 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,166: |
Line 1,166: |
| | |2009 | | |2009 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |Based loosely on the 1952 anime, liberal producers and writers twisted the cartoon to fit their [[communist]] agenda.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4Jqlxd7ufM</ref> This backfired, however, and the film was a critical failure.<ref>http://www.cartoonbrew.com/feature-film/astro-boys-abysmal-opening-and-imagis-sinking-ship-17586.html</ref> | + | |Based loosely on the 1952 anime, liberal producers and writers twisted the cartoon to fit their [[communist]] agenda.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4Jqlxd7ufM</ref> This strategy backfired, however, and the film was a critical failure.<ref>http://www.cartoonbrew.com/feature-film/astro-boys-abysmal-opening-and-imagis-sinking-ship-17586.html</ref> |
| | |$19,551,067 | | |$19,551,067 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,172: |
Line 1,172: |
| | |2006 | | |2006 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |Set on a barnyard where animals speak and behave like humans in the absence of real humans, ''Barnyard'' promotes disorderly conduct, portrays humans as either ignorant or stupid, and demonizes coyotes for being carnivores. The neurotic ferret Freddy goes to liberal lengths to avoid temptation to eat his rooster friend by becoming a [[vegetarianism|vegetarian]]. Not only that, but the bulls lack horns and have female udders, and there are brief scenes referencing alcohol and gambling. On top of that, the movie is widely considered to have stolen much of its plot from greatest conservative animation movie ''The Lion King''. | + | |Set on a barnyard where animals speak and behave like humans in the absence of real humans, ''Barnyard'' promotes disorderly conduct, portrays humans as either ignorant or stupid, and demonizes coyotes for being carnivores. The neurotic ferret Freddy goes to liberal lengths to avoid temptation to eat his rooster friend by becoming a [[vegetarianism|vegetarian]]. Not only that, but the bulls lack horns and have female udders, and there are brief scenes referencing alcohol and gambling. On top of that, the movie is widely considered to have stolen much of its plot from the great conservative animation ''The Lion King''. |
| | |$116,500,000 | | |$116,500,000 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,178: |
Line 1,178: |
| | |2007 | | |2007 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |An animated film that pushes an environmentalist theme and portrays a Bible-quoting, American type military general as the main antagonist. | + | |This animation has environmentalist overtones and portrays a Bible-quoting, American-esque military general as the main antagonist. |
| | |$1,647,083 | | |$1,647,083 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,184: |
Line 1,184: |
| | |2012 | | |2012 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |One of Pixar's less memorable animations stars Merida, a Medieval Scottish princess who refuses to marry, believing it will cause her to lose her life of archery and adventure. This unabashedly promotes feminism and demonstrates poor family values throughout. Of course, the men in the film are doofuses compared to the women, too. Egregiously, Merida was added to the Disney Princess lineup despite the poor morals she demonstrates throughout the film and her being created by Pixar, not by Disney directly. | + | |One of Pixar's less memorable animations stars Merida, a feminist Medieval Scottish princess who refuses to marry, believing it will cause her to lose her life of archery and adventure, thus demonstrating poor family values throughout. Of course, because this is a feminist propaganda piece, the men in the film are oafish compared to the women, too. Egregiously, Merida was added to the Disney Princess lineup despite the poor morals she demonstrates throughout the film and her being created by Pixar, not by Disney directly. |
| | |$540.4 million | | |$540.4 million |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,190: |
Line 1,190: |
| | |2011 | | |2011 |
| | |G | | |G |
| − | |This Pixar sequel demonizes oil companies while promoting ethanol (mentioned as Allinall). On the film's political agenda, director John Lasseter commented: "Why isn't alternative fuel more... Why isn't everybody jumping on that bandwagon? It makes so much sense: Electricity, solar, whatever. There's ethanol. There's all this stuff you could be doing. And so I thought, well, that could be really cool in that you could have big oil versus alternative fuel. That's when we kind of crafted the bad guy's story." | + | |This Pixar sequel demonizes oil companies while aggrandizing ethanol (mentioned as Allinall). On the film's political agenda, director John Lasseter commented: "Why isn't alternative fuel more... Why isn't everybody jumping on that bandwagon? It makes so much sense: Electricity, solar, whatever. There's ethanol. There's all this stuff you could be doing. And so I thought, well, that could be really cool in that you could have big oil versus alternative fuel. That's when we kind of crafted the bad guy's story." |
| | |$191,450,875 | | |$191,450,875 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,202: |
Line 1,202: |
| | |2008 | | |2008 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |Pagan film with horrible scenes of violence, war, and mass murder. Also, the characters may give younger viewers nightmares. The movie bombed completely being so bad it was pulled from theaters after a week and is currently the lowest-grossing computer animated film of all time. | + | |This pagan film has horrible scenes of violence, war, and mass murder. It performed so horribly at the box office that it was criticized for potentially traumatizing young children and was pulled from theaters after a week. It is currently the lowest-grossing computer animated film of all time. |
| | |$694,782 | | |$694,782 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,208: |
Line 1,208: |
| | |2017 | | |2017 |
| | |PG (Should be PG-13 for multiple references to the dreaded S-word in profanity) | | |PG (Should be PG-13 for multiple references to the dreaded S-word in profanity) |
| − | |Not only is this film clearly an infomercial for various smartphone applications and features thinly disguised as an unoriginal take on the "hero's journey" story archetype, but it is also laced with rancid morals such as "Words aren't cool". Openly homosexual writer and director Anthony "Tony" Leondis considers the movie a deeply personal project for him: the main character is a sentient emoji who is different from his friends with his ability to show multiple expressions, which reflects Leondis' laughable belief that he is an outcast when, in reality, Hollyweird praises that sort of sinful sexuality. The film briefly glorifies [[Facebook]], the world's largest social network and a hotbed for narcissism and relationship destruction, and several critics have drawn unflattering comparisons to ''Wreck-It Ralph'' and ''Inside Out'', two great conservative animations, plus the ambiguously conservative ''LEGO Movie''.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydvQB-4bBfQ</ref> Worst of all, TJ Miller, who voices the lead emoji, once said the film contains anti-[[Donald Trump]] messages, particularly allegations that Trump wants to censor Hollywood and other liberally biased media. | + | |Not only is this film clearly an infomercial for various smartphone applications and features thinly disguised as an unoriginal take on the "hero's journey" story archetype, but it is also laced with rancid morals such as "Words aren't cool". Openly homosexual writer and director Anthony "Tony" Leondis considers the movie a deeply personal project for him: the main character is a sentient emoji who is different from his friends with his ability to show multiple expressions, which reflects Leondis' laughable belief that he is an outcast when, in reality, Hollywood praises that sort of sinful sexuality. The film briefly glorifies [[Facebook]], the world's largest social network and a hotbed for narcissism and relationship destruction, and several critics have drawn unflattering comparisons to ''Wreck-It Ralph'' and ''Inside Out'', two great conservative animations, plus the ambiguously conservative ''LEGO Movie''.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydvQB-4bBfQ</ref> Worst of all, TJ Miller, who voices the lead emoji, once said the film contains anti-[[Donald Trump]] messages, particularly allegations that Trump wants to censor Hollywood and other liberally biased media. |
| | |$25,650,000 | | |$25,650,000 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,214: |
Line 1,214: |
| | |1992 | | |1992 |
| | |G | | |G |
| − | |Environmental [[propaganda]], with an anti-industry message, is being indoctrinated to children in the animation film. | + | |Environmental [[propaganda]], with an anti-industry message, is indoctrinated into children. |
| | |$24,650,296 | | |$24,650,296 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,220: |
Line 1,220: |
| | |2012 | | |2012 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |Aside from being considered one of the worst computer animated films, the film is anti-capitalist, and demonizes leading companies. | + | |Aside from being considered one of the worst computer animated films, the film vilifies capitalism and leading companies. |
| | |N/A | | |N/A |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,244: |
Line 1,244: |
| | |1996 | | |1996 |
| | |G | | |G |
| − | |Released during liberal maniac [[Michael Eisner]]'s reign of terror at Disney. The film does everything in its power to demonize Christianity. It is also to be noted that the original source material was not supposed to be given to children yet the Disney film was marketed as such to kids, and in some cases, the film actually managed to be even more darker than the original tale (case in point, originally, Quasimodo's vicious punishment at the hands of the Parisians during the Feast of Fools ceremony was out of corporal punishment, while in the Disney film, it had been done at the whim of the Parisians just for the sake of it. Another example of the film being made darker than the book was the inclusion of a gypsy genocide plot that wasn't even alluded to at all in the original tale). This was a stark contrast to most other Disney films which usually toned down the original works (like in ''The Jungle Book'', where Disney advised the writers to ignore the book specifically because its contents were unsuitable for children). The film, in addition, features some mild swearing (namely the word "damnation" and "eternal damnation"). There was also a scene where one of the male gargoyles fell in love with Djali, who was explicitly male, which may have been a subtle attempt at promoting homosexuality, despite his being one of the gargoyles of Notre Dame. | + | |Released during liberal maniac [[Michael Eisner]]'s reign of terror at Disney, the film does everything in its power to demonize Christianity. The original source material was not supposed to be given to children, yet the Disney film was marketed as such to young audiences. In some cases, the film actually manages to be even more darker than the original book by Victor Hugo: originally, Quasimodo's vicious punishment at the hands of the Parisians during the Feast of Fools ceremony was out of corporal punishment; while in the Disney film, it had been done at the whim of the Parisians just for the sake of it. To make the film even darker, a gypsy genocide plot is introduced. This is a stark contrast to most other Disney film adaptations, which have a history of toning down the original works (as in ''The Jungle Book'', in which Disney advised the writers to ignore the book specifically because its contents were unsuitable for children). Some mild language is present, too (namely the word "damnation" and "eternal damnation"). Worst of all, one of the male gargoyles falls in love with Djali, who is explicitly male, which means that liberals will subtly shoehorn the homosexual agenda into anything, even the gargoyles of Notre Dame. |
| | |$100,138,851 | | |$100,138,851 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,250: |
Line 1,250: |
| | |1999 | | |1999 |
| | |Not Rated | | |Not Rated |
| − | |An animated film that bastardizes a horrific, tragic historical event in the name of making an anti-whaling statement. | + | |This animation bastardizes a horrific, tragic historical event in the name of making an anti-whaling statement. |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,256: |
Line 1,256: |
| | |2016 | | |2016 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |Anti-big-business in the form of a greedy real estate mogul in a possible jab at Donald Trump. Extremely environmentalist. | + | |This poorly-received animation makes an environmentalist polar bear the hero and vilifies major businesses in the form of a greedy real estate mogul in a possible jab at Donald Trump. |
| | |$24.8 million | | |$24.8 million |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,280: |
Line 1,280: |
| | |2006 | | |2006 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |An animated film that depicts humans as complete idiots and demonizes exterminators for simply doing their job. Not to mention, one of the antagonists is a wealthy businesswoman and it is also pro-environmentalism. | + | |Based upon the comic strip of the same name, animals who are struggling to steal food from trash for the winter are the heroes, while humans are painted as ignorant, uncaring towards animals (clearly an environmentalist message), and obsessed with food. Plus, a businesswoman is the main antagonist, and an exterminator is vilified for simply doing his job. |
| | |$155,019,340 | | |$155,019,340 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,298: |
Line 1,298: |
| | |2010 (Japan); 2011 (America) | | |2010 (Japan); 2011 (America) |
| | |G | | |G |
| − | |The anime film demonizes capitalism by making the main villain a successful businessman. In addition, one of the main protagonists of the film, Karl, was based on the radical left-wing schlockumentarist Michael Moore.<ref>http://www.gamefreak.co.jp/blog/art/</ref> | + | |The anime film's villain is a successful businessman, which is a statement against capitalism, and one of the main protagonists of the film, Karl (perhaps named for [[Karl Marx]]), is based on the radical left-wing schlockumentarian Michael Moore.<ref>http://www.gamefreak.co.jp/blog/art/</ref> |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,304: |
Line 1,304: |
| | |2009 | | |2009 |
| | |G | | |G |
| − | |Liberals praised this film for featuring Disney's first African American princess. The film promotes feminism, and is very insulting to Christianity, being filled with Louisiana Voodoo. Instead of having a Fairy Godmother, it contains a blind voodoo priestess. Finally, it mocks traditional values and portrays capitalism and war in a negative light. The movie is also considered to be a rip-off because it took much of its plot from great conservative film ''The Little Mermaid'' <ref>http://crowdofstars.livejournal.com/14186.html</ref> | + | |Liberals praised this film for featuring Disney's first African American princess but ignored the fact that it is a feminist propaganda piece that insults Christianity with Louisiana Voodoo, even replacing the traditional role of the fairy godmother with a blind voodoo priestess. Capitalism, war, and the importance of family are all painted negatively. On top of that, ''The Princess and the Frog'' is said to have stolen much of its plot from great conservative film ''The Little Mermaid'' <ref>http://crowdofstars.livejournal.com/14186.html</ref> |
| | |$104,400,899 | | |$104,400,899 |
| | |- | | |- |