| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | <!--If anyone is going to add ''Frozen'' to this list, do NOT claim as one of the reasons as it promoting the homosexual agenda. John Nolte already confirmed on Breitbart that it does not promote the homosexual agenda in any way.--> | + | <!--If anyone is going to add ''Frozen'' to this list, do NOT claim as one of the reasons as it enforcing the homosexual agenda. John Nolte already confirmed on Breitbart that it does not do so in any way.--> |
| − | While a good amount of [[Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies|great conservative films]] are produced every year, [[Hollywood values|Hollywood]] continues to produce films that attempt to normalize and aggrandize amoral lifestyles and liberal bias. Below is a list of some of the more egregious examples: | + | While a good amount of [[Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies|great conservative films]] is produced every year, [[Hollywood values|Hollywood]] continues to produce films that attempt to normalize and aggrandize amoral lifestyles and liberal bias. Below is a list of some of the more egregious examples: |
| | | | |
| | ==Politically liberal films== | | ==Politically liberal films== |
| Line 32: |
Line 32: |
| | |2000 | | |2000 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |Don't be fooled by the false patriotic title. It's the most [[Anti-American]] film you'll ever see. It's also considered a "comedy", just the fact that anyone who thinks a plot about stockbroker who's secretly a serial killer is funny is just disgusting. | + | |Don't be fooled by the false patriotic title. It's the most [[Anti-American]] film you'll ever see because it attempts to pass a stockbroker as a secret serial killer. |
| | |$15,070,285 | | |$15,070,285 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 38: |
Line 38: |
| | |2013 | | |2013 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |Uwe Boll (often referred to as the worst director of this generation and known for his furious and spiteful responses to negative reception)<ref>https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Uwe-Boll-considered-one-of-the-worst-film-directors-in-history</ref><ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BvLQb2uwW4</ref> makes a completely inaccurate film that blames capitalism for the [[Recession of 2008|Great Recession]] and the downfall of the everyday man's life. The film plays out like an angry middle school boy's fan fiction revenge story, in which all the bankers are summary executionized ([[Russian Revolution|Now, where have we seen that before in history?]]). Boll has said how "We need to f-ing kill the rich", which only shows how uneducated he is.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQJwEAqzFs4</ref> | + | |Uwe Boll (often referred to as the worst director of this generation and known for his furious and spiteful responses to negative reception)<ref>https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Uwe-Boll-considered-one-of-the-worst-film-directors-in-history</ref><ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BvLQb2uwW4</ref> makes a completely inaccurate film that blames capitalism for the [[Recession of 2008|Great Recession]] and the downfall of the everyday man's life. The film plays out like an angry middle school boy's fan fiction revenge story, in which all the bankers are summary executed (as in the [[Russian Revolution]]). Boll has said how "We need to f-ing kill the rich", which only shows how uneducated he is.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQJwEAqzFs4</ref> |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 50: |
Line 50: |
| | |1915 | | |1915 |
| | |N/A | | |N/A |
| − | |This infamously racist film depicts the [[Ku Klux Klan]] as "heroes" (the KKK was founded by the Democratic Party, even though the left has repeatedly tried denying the connection between the two). The film is particularly notorious for being the first ever film to be shown at the White House under Democrat President [[Woodrow Wilson]], as well as significantly influencing his already-racist core to segregate the White House and various departments. | + | |This infamously racist film, once the longest ever made, begins by documenting the [[American Civil War]], then depicts the [[Ku Klux Klan]] as "heroes" who vanquish people of color, who are depicted as black racial stereotypes, from political positions and from their lawful right to vote (the KKK was founded by the Democratic Party, even though the left has repeatedly tried denying the connection between the two). The film is particularly notorious for being the first ever film to be shown at the White House under Democrat President [[Woodrow Wilson]], as well as significantly influencing his already-racist core to segregate the White House and various departments. |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 62: |
Line 62: |
| | |1992 | | |1992 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |An anti-conservative propaganda piece released during the 1992 election. Similar to ''The Candidate'', this was made by another Hollywood leftist (this time Tim Robbins) and claims to be a "comedy" but only demonizes conservatives. | + | |This anti-conservative propaganda piece, directed by leftist Tim Robbins and released during the 1992 election, has a similar premise to that of ''The Candidate'' and denigrates conservatives. |
| | |$4,479,470 | | |$4,479,470 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 68: |
Line 68: |
| | |1989 | | |1989 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |This radically anti-[[Vietnam War]] biographical film is produced and directed by communist sympathizer Oliver Stone, starring Tom Cruise as paralyzed Vietnam War vet-turned-anti-Vietnam War leftist protester and communist sympathizer [[Ron Kovic]]. | + | |This radically anti-[[Vietnam War]] biographical film was produced and directed by communist sympathizer Oliver Stone, starring Tom Cruise as paralyzed Vietnam War vet-turned-anti-Vietnam War leftist protester and communist sympathizer [[Ron Kovic]]. |
| | |$70,001,698 | | |$70,001,698 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 74: |
Line 74: |
| | |1972 | | |1972 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |This "comedy" fails to be a political satire as it fails to lampoon both sides of the coin a just be straight up pro-[[George McGovern]] propaganda. It was released during the 1972 election year only to demonize [[Richard Nixon]] and his conservative colleagues. Conservative star [[James Stewart]] refused to star in it for that reason. | + | |This "comedy" fails to be a political satire as it fails to lampoon both sides of the coin and supports [[George McGovern]] at every turn. It was released during the 1972 election year as a smear campaign against [[Richard Nixon]] and his conservative colleagues. Conservative star [[James Stewart]] refused to star in it for that reason. |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 92: |
Line 92: |
| | |2008; 2009 | | |2008; 2009 |
| | |NR | | |NR |
| − | |As implied by the name, the film is a two-part biopic for the Argentine Marxist terrorist and mass murderer [[Che Guevara]]. As expected, the film treats him in a positive light. | + | |As implied by the name, the film is a two-part biopic for the Argentine Marxist terrorist and mass murderer [[Che Guevara]], who is treated sympathetically as a "martyr" for communism. |
| | |US$40.9 million | | |US$40.9 million |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 98: |
Line 98: |
| | |1979 | | |1979 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |The movie depicts a meltdown of a fictional [[nuclear power]] plant. The film greatly over-hypes this risk of a [[nuclear accident]]/meltdown and the resultant damage. This film along with the [[Three Mile Island]] incident (which occurred shortly after the film's release) are often credited for killing the nuclear power industry in America. | + | |A fictional [[nuclear power]] plant melts down. The film greatly over-hypes this risk of a [[nuclear accident]] (or meltdown) and the resultant damage. This film, along with the [[Three Mile Island]] incident (which occurred shortly after the film's release), are both credited for killing the nuclear power industry in America. |
| | |$51,718,367 | | |$51,718,367 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 110: |
Line 110: |
| | |1981 | | |1981 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |This anti-American war film positively portrays the German perspective of [[World War II]]. | + | |This anti-American war film positively portrays the Nazi perspective of [[World War II]]. |
| | |$11,487,676 | | |$11,487,676 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 128: |
Line 128: |
| | |1995 | | |1995 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |A senseless criticism of [[capital punishment]], with an ending that left some liberal viewers even more confused. | + | |It senselessly criticizes [[capital punishment]] with an ending that left some liberal viewers even more confused. |
| | |$39,363,635 | | |$39,363,635 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 134: |
Line 134: |
| | |2012 | | |2012 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |The plot of the movie is about a Middle Eastern taking over America. It is suppose to be a comedy, but it’s very raunchy and vulgar. | + | |A Middle Easterner takes over America in this raunchy, vulgar "comedy" straining for controversy. |
| | |$59,650,222 | | |$59,650,222 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 146: |
Line 146: |
| | |1940 | | |1940 |
| | |NR | | |NR |
| − | |An anti-Semitic propaganda film churned out by the Nazis. It was made with direct input from Adolf Hitler, who had the film be a lot more direct in the anti-Semitic messaging, which infamously had most audiences fainting at the crudity of the messages. | + | |This antisemitic Nazi propaganda film was made with direct input from Adolf Hitler, who made sure the antisemitism was as blunt and direct as possible. Most audiences were shocked at the crudity of the messages. |
| | |Unknown | | |Unknown |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 164: |
Line 164: |
| | |1997 | | |1997 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |An environmentalism film with Steven Seagal playing a Gary Stu like role. | + | |Steven Seagal plays a Gary Stu-like role in this environmentalist feature. |
| | |$16,228,448 | | |$16,228,448 |
| − |
| |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''[[Frost/Nixon]]'' | | |''[[Frost/Nixon]]'' |
| | |2008 | | |2008 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |A liberal movie meant to further tarnish the reputation of [[Richard Nixon]]. | + | |As implied by the title, it attempts to further tarnish the reputation of [[Richard Nixon]]. |
| | |$18,622,031 | | |$18,622,031 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 177: |
Line 176: |
| | |2012 | | |2012 |
| | |Not Rated | | |Not Rated |
| − | |[[Liberal]] haters play [[conservative]]s in an [[HBO]] movie about [[Sarah Palin]]. Many debunked controversies are highlighted in the plot. Both [[John McCain|McCain]] and Palin denounced the film and called it fiction. | + | |[[Liberal]] haters play [[conservative]]s in an [[HBO]] film about [[Sarah Palin]]. Many debunked controversies are highlighted in the plot. Both [[John McCain|McCain]] and Palin denounced the film and called it fiction. |
| | |NA - TV | | |NA - TV |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 183: |
Line 182: |
| | |2011 | | |2011 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |Depiste its name the movie is a rip-off of the conservative film Falling Down, this "comedy" has a miserable man and his foul-mouthed [[nihilist]] girl sidekick summary executes [[Tea Party]] members, a Fox News like-host, Christians, and other conservative stereotypes. | + | |Despite its name the movie is a rip-off of the conservative film ''Falling Down'', this "comedy" has a miserable man and his foul-mouthed [[nihilist]] girl sidekick summary executes [[Tea Party]] members, a Fox News like-host, Christians, and other conservative stereotypes. |
| | |$123,000 | | |$123,000 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 189: |
Line 188: |
| | |2016 | | |2016 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |Despite being the sequel to the patriotic and to a certain extent Conservative film ''Independence Day'', the film, despite the title, does not actually promote the concepts of patriotism, American exceptionalism, or even mention national sovereignty at all. Instead, most of the movie seems to promote globalist-style government, and also has Doctor Okun being revealed to be a homosexual despite such never being implied in the original film. Also has some forced multicultural elements as well. | + | |Although it is the sequel to the patriotic and to a certain extent conservative film ''Independence Day'', it does not at all reference the concepts of patriotism, American exceptionalism, or even national sovereignty. Instead, most of the movie seems to support globalism, and Doctor Okun is revealed to be a homosexual despite such never being implied in the original film. Forced multicultural elements are present as well. |
| | |$389.7 million | | |$389.7 million |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 195: |
Line 194: |
| | |1991 | | |1991 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |A bastardized historical inaccurate account on John F. Kennedy's assassination, in order to serve liberal filmmaker Oliver Stone's insanely fanatic conspiracy theories. For example, the filmmaker pinpoints the blame to the "real murder" of Pres. Kennedy: the conservative politicians, the U.S. Military, and then-Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, all of whom want America to go to war in Vietnam because Kennedy rejected the American involvement. Stone described the film as a "counter-myth" to the Warren Commission's "fictional myth." | + | |This historically inaccurate account on John F. Kennedy's assassination serves liberal filmmaker Oliver Stone's insanely fanatic conspiracy theories. For example, the filmmaker pinpoints the blame to the "real murder" of Pres. Kennedy: the conservative politicians, the U.S. Military, and then-Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, all of whom want America to go to war in Vietnam because Kennedy rejected the American involvement. Stone described the film as a "counter-myth" to the Warren Commission's "fictional myth." |
| | |$70,405,498 | | |$70,405,498 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 201: |
Line 200: |
| | |2013 | | |2013 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| − | |An attack on [[capitalist]]s and the [[military]], portraying the former as ruthless, greedy railroad executives and the latter as 'thugs' who support their actions. it distorts the messages of its source material by displaying the [[Lone Ranger]], shown to be a smart intellectual character in the original TV show and radio show, as dumb-founded and unintelligent, instead featuring his sidekick [[Tonto]] (played by [[liberal]] [[marijuana|pot]]-smoker [[Johnny Depp]]) as not only the "star" of the film, but as the Lone Ranger's "voice of reason". | + | |This attack on [[capitalist]]s and the [[military]] portrays the former as ruthless, greedy railroad executives and the latter as 'thugs' who support their actions. It distorts the messages of its source material by displaying the [[Lone Ranger]], shown to be a smart intellectual character in the original TV and radio serials, as dumbfounded and unintelligent, instead featuring his sidekick [[Tonto]] (played by [[liberal]] [[marijuana|pot]]-smoker [[Johnny Depp]]) not only as the "star" of the film but as the Lone Ranger's "voice of reason", too. |
| | |$89,302,115 | | |$89,302,115 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 207: |
Line 206: |
| | |2016 | | |2016 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| − | |This remake suits the left agenda, as capitalists are the villains in this remake.<ref>http://missliberty.com/magnificent-seven-remake-is-angry-radical-fantasy/</ref> | + | |This remake of a Western about seven vigilante gunfighters out to save a peaceful Mexican farming village from marauders (itself an adaptation of the Japanese cinematic classic ''Seven Samurai'') suits the left agenda, as capitalists are the villains.<ref>http://missliberty.com/magnificent-seven-remake-is-angry-radical-fantasy/</ref> |
| | |$93,145,387 | | |$93,145,387 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 225: |
Line 224: |
| | |2011 | | |2011 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| − | |The main character, a liberal author, is portrayed as open-minded and intellectual. He has an unsuccessful relationship with a woman whose family is Republican and are portrayed as materialistic, selfish, narrow-minded, and hateful towards any country that is not the United States. | + | |The main character, a liberal author, is open-minded and intellectual. He has an unsuccessful relationship with a woman whose family is Republican and are materialistic, selfish, narrow-minded, and hateful towards any country that is not the United States. |
| | |$56,816,662 | | |$56,816,662 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 243: |
Line 242: |
| | |1991 | | |1991 |
| | |15 | | |15 |
| − | |The more openly liberal sequel to the apolitical ''The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad!'' pushes environmentalism and demonizes productive businesses, especially the oil industry. | + | |The more openly liberal sequel to the apolitical ''The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad!'' pushes environmentalism and attacks productive businesses, especially the oil industry. |
| | |$86,930,411 | | |$86,930,411 |
| | |- | | |- |