Changes

I'm not objective because I've been editing the article myself. It seems to ''me'' that [[User:RightWolf2]] has the impression that unsupported opinion is OK as long as it's ''conservative'' opinion, and is at least near the borderline of Conservapedia Commandment #6. It particularly bothers me that, in order to support the statement that

I'm not objective because I've been editing the article myself. It seems to ''me'' that [[User:RightWolf2]] has the impression that unsupported opinion is OK as long as it's ''conservative'' opinion, and is at least near the borderline of Conservapedia Commandment #6. It particularly bothers me that, in order to support the statement that

:"[Wikipedia's] Mediation Committee, Arbitration Committee, and number of site adminitrators contain a disproportionate number of homosexual members in comparison to demographic percentages within the Wikipedia Community."  

:"[Wikipedia's] Mediation Committee, Arbitration Committee, and number of site administrators contain a disproportionate number of homosexual members in comparison to demographic percentages within the Wikipedia Community."  

he cites http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/ although the link page contains neither the word "homosexual" nor the word "gay." Perhaps there is relevant material on that site, but it's his job to find it and cite it, not to keep reinserting a link to this site's home page. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:58, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

he cites http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/ although the link page contains neither the word "homosexual" nor the word "gay." Perhaps there is relevant material on that site, but it's his job to find it and cite it, not to keep reinserting a link to this site's home page. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:58, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

:Wikipedia-Watch is Daniel Brandt's site.  I don't know if it states that outright, but I try and look into it.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:04, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

:Wikipedia-Watch is Daniel Brandt's site.  I don't know if it states that outright, but I try and look into it.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:04, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

:This here http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/hivemind.html I think is what he is refering to.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:10, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

:This here http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/hivemind.html I think is what he is referring to.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:10, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

::The word "homosexual" isn't on that page, either. Only one reference to "gay," an assertion that a Wikipedia administrator "attempt[ed] to falsely suggest that Brandt is gay."

::The word "homosexual" isn't on that page, either. Only one reference to "gay," an assertion that a Wikipedia administrator "attempt[ed] to falsely suggest that Brandt is gay."

::My objection is ''not'' that he's citing a strongly anti-Wikipedian website, although this should probably be made clear. The question is: does the site really say what he says it says, and, if so, where? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:00, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

::My objection is ''not'' that he's citing a strongly anti-Wikipedian website, although this should probably be made clear. The question is: does the site really say what he says it says, and, if so, where? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:00, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

== What happened here ==

== What happened here ==

Goodness! Whatever happend here? --~ [[User:TK|TK]] ^{[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]} 02:15, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

Goodness! Whatever happened here? --~ [[User:TK|TK]] ^{[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]} 02:15, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

:The page was archived, TK.  Use the little history button at the top of the page. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 02:18, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

:The page was archived, TK.  Use the little history button at the top of the page. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 02:18, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

::I archived the page, as it was too large. <font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 02:19, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

::I archived the page, as it was too large. <font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 02:19, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

Speaking of large...that Conservative Abuse page is very much too long!  I shall archive it now. Gee, I hope I do it right...anyone wanna say how to do it correctly?  Or maybe somone wants to do it themself?  :p --~ [[User:TK|TK]] ^{[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]} 03:42, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

Speaking of large...that Conservative Abuse page is very much too long!  I shall archive it now. Gee, I hope I do it right...anyone wanna say how to do it correctly?  Or maybe someone wants to do it themself?  :p --~ [[User:TK|TK]] ^{[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]} 03:42, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

Excuse me, but adding the conservative Christian view of sex to [[Heterosexuality]] is not "trolling", and neither is removing loaded words like "genocide" and "murder" from [[Holocaust]]. [[User:AppliedFaith|AppliedFaith]] 10:53, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

Excuse me, but adding the conservative Christian view of sex to [[Heterosexuality]] is not "trolling", and neither is removing loaded words like "genocide" and "murder" from [[Holocaust]]. [[User:AppliedFaith|AppliedFaith]] 10:53, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

::We are debating "editing done in an attempt to embarrass conservapedia" [http://www.conservapedia.com/User:CPAdmin1/Proposed_Block_Policy#Attempting_to_embarass_Conservapedia]right now with a recommended ban of 6 months.  These two edits, in my view, could earn you a one year ban, but you are free to put your input on that discussion page if you feel these were not attemtps to embarass Conservapedia.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:19, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

::We are debating "editing done in an attempt to embarrass conservapedia" [http://www.conservapedia.com/User:CPAdmin1/Proposed_Block_Policy#Attempting_to_embarass_Conservapedia]right now with a recommended ban of 6 months.  These two edits, in my view, could earn you a one year ban, but you are free to put your input on that discussion page if you feel these were not attempts to embarrass Conservapedia.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:19, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

: 'Genocide' and 'Murder' are both legal charges that the instigators of the Holocaust were found guilty of. They are facts. Conservapedia is in favour of facts (a fairly difficult statement, but bear with me). Hence removing facts from Conservapedia is trolling. [[User:Wikinterpreter|Wikinterpreter]]

: 'Genocide' and 'Murder' are both legal charges that the instigators of the Holocaust were found guilty of. They are facts. Conservapedia is in favour of facts (a fairly difficult statement, but bear with me). Hence removing facts from Conservapedia is trolling. [[User:Wikinterpreter|Wikinterpreter]]

*{{user|Britinme}} history of adding copyright violations.[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Albania&diff=prev&oldid=64017][http://www.conservapedia.com/AFD_American_Friends_Service_Commission]  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:06, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

*{{user|Britinme}} history of adding copyright violations.[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Albania&diff=prev&oldid=64017][http://www.conservapedia.com/AFD_American_Friends_Service_Commission]  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:06, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

::I strongly object to this characterisation. The American Friends Service Committee stuff is licensed under creative commons - no copyright violations there. If you check, you'll find that the Albania stuff is only on one other site on the internet, and that's QI. It's on QI because I am a moderator on that site and I wrote it, so if there's any copyright there it belongs to me. Please withdraw your accusation and apologize. This statement should not be posted here without checking any such issues with me - that's the height of discourtesy.--[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 18:30, 30 April 2007 (EDT)

::I strongly object to this characterization. The American Friends Service Committee stuff is licensed under creative commons - no copyright violations there. If you check, you'll find that the Albania stuff is only on one other site on the internet, and that's QI. It's on QI because I am a moderator on that site and I wrote it, so if there's any copyright there it belongs to me. Please withdraw your accusation and apologize. This statement should not be posted here without checking any such issues with me - that's the height of discourtesy.--[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 18:30, 30 April 2007 (EDT)

:::Thank you.  It will be investigated.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:18, 30 April 2007 (EDT)

:::Thank you.  It will be investigated.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:18, 30 April 2007 (EDT)