374
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + + + + +
→suggestion: new section
Hello Snoopy2, thank you for your contributions to CP -- I enjoy seeing your edits. While this may be a relatively small issue, please use proper punctuation when editing, such as by putting periods at the end of sentences. I have corrected many of your more recent edits. Thanks! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:20, 25 July 2017 (EDT)
Hello Snoopy2, thank you for your contributions to CP -- I enjoy seeing your edits. While this may be a relatively small issue, please use proper punctuation when editing, such as by putting periods at the end of sentences. I have corrected many of your more recent edits. Thanks! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:20, 25 July 2017 (EDT)
== suggestion ==
Misuse and ambiguity of the word "evolution" harms understanding and honest debate. Often a definition of "change over time" is given for this term (that I and nearly every person accept). Then, in a slippery, unacknowledged bait and switch acceptance of '''change over time''' becomes belief that "the Cosmos is all there is and of that we are certain." In today's world "evolution" is an ambiguous term with each of these definitions considered valid (and therefore as imprecise a term as you could get). The suggested remedy is to use only "Darwinism" when discussing Naturalism or its stepchild Methodological Naturalism.
Comments?