Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 472: Line 472:  
"Up" is actually on this list, you do make some good points on the film being borderline. Yes, they try to save the bird, but it's not really in an environmental way, it's more in a human saving a pet way as Russell found this specific bird, and he was saving that bird because it was like his friend, not because it was an endangered bird. Plus Mentz was almost like a poacher, so I do really think the film could be considered environmental. --[[User:GrantN|GrantN]] ([[User talk:GrantN|talk]]) 21:12, 13 October 2017 (EDT)
 
"Up" is actually on this list, you do make some good points on the film being borderline. Yes, they try to save the bird, but it's not really in an environmental way, it's more in a human saving a pet way as Russell found this specific bird, and he was saving that bird because it was like his friend, not because it was an endangered bird. Plus Mentz was almost like a poacher, so I do really think the film could be considered environmental. --[[User:GrantN|GrantN]] ([[User talk:GrantN|talk]]) 21:12, 13 October 2017 (EDT)
   −
I don't know why All Dogs Go to Heaven is on here.  Generally I'd put all of the Don Bluth works on here, but this one is the EXCEPTION, due to the fact that pretty much all scoundrels (Charlie, Itchy, Car Face, etc) are able to get into heaven and the concept of damnation is pretty much an afterthought.    Now if Charlie had reformed at the end of the first movie, that would be one thing, but apparently, in the sequel, he's back to his old ways again.  All in all, it's generally not good if the "hero" of your story is little better morally than your villain.  [[User:PatriotMongoose|PatriotMongoose]] ([[User talk:PatriotMongoose|talk]]) 23:47, 13 October 2017 (EDT)
+
==I think All Dogs Go to Heaven should be removed==
 +
 
 +
I don't know why All Dogs Go to Heaven is on here.  Generally I'd put all of the Don Bluth works on here, but this one is the EXCEPTION, due to the fact that pretty much all scoundrels (Charlie, Itchy, Car Face, etc) are able to get into heaven and the concept of damnation is pretty much an afterthought.    Now if Charlie had reformed at the end of the first movie, that would be one thing, but apparently, in the sequel, he's back to his old ways again.  All in all, it's generally not good if the "hero" of your story is little better morally than your villain.  Also,
 +
it does send the liberal message that you can do whatever the heck you want in life and there are no consequences for it (save that Car Face finally got his at the end of the second movie,
 +
though Charlie kept getting breaks for his bad behavior.) [[User:PatriotMongoose|PatriotMongoose]] ([[User talk:PatriotMongoose|talk]]) 23:47, 13 October 2017 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha
360

edits

Navigation menu