SkipCaptcha
360
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 62:
Line 62: + + +
Talk:Liberal corporate tyranny (view source)
Revision as of 03:38, October 17, 2017
, 03:38, October 17, 2017no edit summary
I was going through one particular section trying to tabulate the data to save space when I noticed some slightly concerning issues. Firstly, there appeared to be several lists pasted together, with no apparent effort made to eliminate duplicates. I eliminated a number of these duplicates (12,052 bytes worth!) but these still may be some. In some cases, there were up to six duplicate entries of the same company in this section. Since these lists do not use standardized formats, it is difficult to do automated duplicate checks. Secondly, when these lists were put together, formatting was not standardized. Once section in the middle did not even have bullet points. They also were not alphabetized together; there were a number of individually alphabetized lists pasted one after another. My cleanup edit is [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_corporate_tyranny&curid=138294&diff=1380027&oldid=1380018 here] Maybe you were going to clean this up anyway, I don't know. Many of your lists are much better than this one.<br />
I was going through one particular section trying to tabulate the data to save space when I noticed some slightly concerning issues. Firstly, there appeared to be several lists pasted together, with no apparent effort made to eliminate duplicates. I eliminated a number of these duplicates (12,052 bytes worth!) but these still may be some. In some cases, there were up to six duplicate entries of the same company in this section. Since these lists do not use standardized formats, it is difficult to do automated duplicate checks. Secondly, when these lists were put together, formatting was not standardized. Once section in the middle did not even have bullet points. They also were not alphabetized together; there were a number of individually alphabetized lists pasted one after another. My cleanup edit is [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_corporate_tyranny&curid=138294&diff=1380027&oldid=1380018 here] Maybe you were going to clean this up anyway, I don't know. Many of your lists are much better than this one.<br />
I appreciate your enthusiasm to list these all out, but in so doing, things seem to be getting a little messy sometimes. I know it's a pain to check for duplicates and review everything carefully, but could you at least do some cursory cleanup on these lists? You are doing a great job of gathering these, I just hope we can maintain quality with all of this quantity. Thank you! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 20:06, 9 October 2017 (EDT)
I appreciate your enthusiasm to list these all out, but in so doing, things seem to be getting a little messy sometimes. I know it's a pain to check for duplicates and review everything carefully, but could you at least do some cursory cleanup on these lists? You are doing a great job of gathering these, I just hope we can maintain quality with all of this quantity. Thank you! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 20:06, 9 October 2017 (EDT)
==Suggested page rename==
I was thinking that we should rename it "liberal corporate advocacy" as not every item on here is now tyranny like the Gaystapo/Transtapo. However, every item on here is corporate support for liberal/RINO (or crony capitalist) causes. (One item, the one about the parents television council, though, may be breaking a rule as they are just companies found advertising the most on shows with bad (like gay, violent, sexual, etc) content. I had been discouraged from adding sponsors of something where companies advertised on a liberal leaning venue if that advertising was likely the only tie between them and said liberalism due to them wanting to get a large reach to make a profit. However, I'd already added that bit about the television council before being informed of that. Still, I think, at least in that case, it was for multiple shows, and not just one show (in order words, it's not just a One Million Moms target of one show but shows a repeated pattern. Even if not deliberate, it was at least acute negligence to do it multiple times enough to get listed as the worst for 2016.) [[User:PatriotMongoose|PatriotMongoose]] ([[User talk:PatriotMongoose|talk]]) 23:38, 16 October 2017 (EDT)