Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
811 bytes added ,  02:22, October 20, 2017
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
In the American electoral system, a '''primary election''' is an election that determines the nominee for each [[political party]], who then competes for the office in the general election. A '''presidential primary''' is a state election that picks the delegates committed to nominate particular candidates for president of the United States.  A '''presidential caucus''', as in Iowa, requires voters to meet together for several hours in face-to-face meetings that select county delegates, who eventually pick the delegates to the national convention.  No other country uses primaries; they choose their candidates in party conventions.  
+
In the American electoral system, a '''primary election''' is an election that determines the nominee for each [[political party]], who then competes for the office in the general election. A '''presidential primary''' is a state election that picks the delegates committed to nominate particular candidates for president of the United States.  A '''presidential caucus''', as in Iowa, requires voters to meet together for several hours in face-to-face meetings that select county delegates, who eventually pick the delegates to the national convention.  No other country uses primaries; they choose their candidates in party conventions. Primary elections are held on every level and branch of American government.
    
==History==
 
==History==
−
Primaries were introduced in the [[Progressive Era]] in the early 20th century to weaken the power of bosses and make the system more democratic.  In presidential elections, they became important starting in 1952, when the first-in-the-nation [[New Hampshire Primary]] helped give [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] the Republican nomination, and knocked [[Harry S. Truman]] out of the Democratic race because of his poor showing. In 1964, [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] ended his reelection campaign after doing poorly in New Hampshire.  
+
Primaries were introduced in the [[Progressive Era]] in the early 20th century to weaken the power of bosses and make the system more democratic.  In presidential elections, they became important starting in 1952, when the first-in-the-nation [[New Hampshire Primary]] helped give [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] the Republican nomination, and knocked [[Harry S. Truman]] out of the Democratic race because of his poor showing. In 1964, [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] ended his reelection campaign after doing poorly in New Hampshire.  
    
After 1968, both parties changed their rules to emphasize presidential primaries, although some states still use the caucus system.
 
After 1968, both parties changed their rules to emphasize presidential primaries, although some states still use the caucus system.
Line 9: Line 9:     
==Advantages==
 
==Advantages==
−
The primary allows voters to choose between different candidates of the some political parties, perhaps representing different wings of the party. For example, a Republican primary may choose between a range of candidates from moderate to conservative. Gallup's 2008 polling data indicated a trend in primary elections towards more conservative candidates, despite the more liberal result in the general election.
+
The primary allows voters to choose between different candidates of the political parties, perhaps representing different wings of the party. For example, a Republican primary may choose between a range of candidates from moderate to conservative. Gallup's 2008 polling data indicated a trend in primary elections towards more conservative candidates, despite the more liberal result in the general election.
   −
In many states, the cost of conducting a primary election is funding by the taxpayers, while the cost of a caucus is funded by the political party.  Political parties in turn recover those costs through filing fees imposed on the candidates.  Voting in a primary is more convenient because the election laws of the state apply, including a local polling place for each precinct; all-day voting hours; and absentee voting.  A caucus is usually held in central locations and in many states, all voters must be present at the same time in the same location.
+
In many states, the cost of conducting a primary election is funding by the taxpayers, while the cost of a caucus is funded by the political party.  Political parties, in turn, recover those costs through filing fees imposed on the candidates.  Voting in a primary is more convenient because the election laws of the state apply, including a local polling place for each precinct; all-day voting hours; and absentee voting.  A caucus is usually held in central locations and in many states, all voters must be present at the same time in the same location.
    
==Control and impact of the primary==
 
==Control and impact of the primary==
Line 28: Line 28:  
[[File:Primary-date.jpg|thumb|350px|states move up primaries earlier and earlier; in 2008 4 states held primaries in January and 21 in February]]
 
[[File:Primary-date.jpg|thumb|350px|states move up primaries earlier and earlier; in 2008 4 states held primaries in January and 21 in February]]
   −
In recent years the primary seasons has come earlier and earlier, as states move up to earlier dates in the hope it will give them more leverage.  For example, [[Barry Goldwater]] won the 1964 nomination because he won the last primary in California. The logic is faulty—in highly contested races the later primaries have more leverage.  Thus in 2008 California gave up its traditional last-in-the-nation role and joined 20 other states on Super Tuesday.  Neither the candidates not the voters paid it much attention.  Michigan and Florida moved up their primaries in defiance of national Democratic Party rules and were penalized. The result is the primary season is extended, and is far more expensive, and no state gets an advantage—except for Iowa and New Hampshire, which now have dates in early January.
+
In recent years the primary seasons has come earlier and earlier, as states move up to earlier dates in the hope it will give them more leverage.  For example, [[Barry Goldwater]] won the 1964 nomination because he won the last primary in California. The logic is faulty—in highly contested races the later primaries have more leverage.  Thus in 2008 California gave up its traditional last-in-the-nation role and joined 20 other states on Super Tuesday.  Neither the candidates nor the voters paid it much attention.  Michigan and Florida moved up their primaries in defiance of national Democratic Party rules and were penalized. The result is the primary season is extended and is far more expensive, and no state gets an advantage—except for Iowa and New Hampshire, which now have dates in early January.
    
In late 2009 the two national parties are meeting to find a common solution.
 
In late 2009 the two national parties are meeting to find a common solution.
 +
 +
==Jungle primary==
 +
Some states, such as [[California]], [[Louisiana]], and [[Washington]], have what is known as a '''jungle primary''', where every candidate regardless of party competes together in the primary election and the top two candidates are able to face each other in the general election. Jungle primaries are generally supported by those on the [[Liberal|Left]], and in California, they have weakened GOP power and made the Democrat Party more left-wing.<ref>Fleischman, Jon (October 18, 2017). [http://www.breitbart.com/california/2017/10/18/fleischman-ca-gop-has-fared-poorly-after-passage-of-prop-14/ FLEISCHMAN: CA GOP Has Fared Poorly in ‘Jungle Primary’ Era]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved October 19, 2017.</ref>
 +
 
==Further reading==
 
==Further reading==
 
* Duncan, Dayton. ''Grass roots: one year in the life of the New Hampshire presidential primary'' (1991) 436 pages; on 1988 campaign
 
* Duncan, Dayton. ''Grass roots: one year in the life of the New Hampshire presidential primary'' (1991) 436 pages; on 1988 campaign
 
* Johnson, Haynes, and Dan Balz. ''The Battle for America 2008: The Story of an Extraordinary Election'' (2009), excellent history of 2008 primaries
 
* Johnson, Haynes, and Dan Balz. ''The Battle for America 2008: The Story of an Extraordinary Election'' (2009), excellent history of 2008 primaries
 
* Kamarck, Elaine C. ''Primary Politics: How Presidential Candidates Have Shaped the Modern Nominating System'' (2009)  [http://www.amazon.com/Primary-Politics-Presidential-Candidates-Nominating/dp/0815702922/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1260466924&sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]
 
* Kamarck, Elaine C. ''Primary Politics: How Presidential Candidates Have Shaped the Modern Nominating System'' (2009)  [http://www.amazon.com/Primary-Politics-Presidential-Candidates-Nominating/dp/0815702922/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1260466924&sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]
 +
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 +
 
[[Category:United States Presidential Elections]]
 
[[Category:United States Presidential Elections]]
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035

edits

Navigation menu