| Line 38: |
Line 38: |
| | [[File:Second dog with a bone.jpg|right|thumbnail|320px|Atheists obsessed with [[Conservapedia]] are like a [[dog]] with a bone. Their dogged persistence in thinking about Conservapedia, discussing Conservapedia and making forecasts about Conservapedia is quite prodigious and intense. ]] | | [[File:Second dog with a bone.jpg|right|thumbnail|320px|Atheists obsessed with [[Conservapedia]] are like a [[dog]] with a bone. Their dogged persistence in thinking about Conservapedia, discussing Conservapedia and making forecasts about Conservapedia is quite prodigious and intense. ]] |
| | Conservapedia was founded by [[Andy Schlafly]] who is the son of the late anti-[[feminism|feminist]] [[Phyllis Schlafly]]. Yet, even the feminist [[Monica Shores]] quoted Conservapedia's material related to the [[New Atheism|new atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]]. Her ''Ms. Magazine'' article titled ''Will “[[New Atheism]]” Make Room For Women?'' was one of the first articles criticizing the New Atheism movement for being [[sexism|sexist]].<ref>[http://msmagazine.com/blog/2010/11/01/will-new-atheism-make-room-for-women/ ''Will “New Atheism” Make Room For Women''] by Monica Shores, ''Ms. Magazine''</ref> She also cited [[Conservapedia]] in her article and indicated: "The lack of lady presence is so visible that Conservapedia commented on it by noting that [[Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science website|Dawkins’ website]] overwhelmingly attracts male visitors."<ref>[http://msmagazine.com/blog/2010/11/01/will-new-atheism-make-room-for-women/ ''Will “New Atheism” Make Room For Women''] by Monica Shores, ''Ms. Magazine''</ref> | | Conservapedia was founded by [[Andy Schlafly]] who is the son of the late anti-[[feminism|feminist]] [[Phyllis Schlafly]]. Yet, even the feminist [[Monica Shores]] quoted Conservapedia's material related to the [[New Atheism|new atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]]. Her ''Ms. Magazine'' article titled ''Will “[[New Atheism]]” Make Room For Women?'' was one of the first articles criticizing the New Atheism movement for being [[sexism|sexist]].<ref>[http://msmagazine.com/blog/2010/11/01/will-new-atheism-make-room-for-women/ ''Will “New Atheism” Make Room For Women''] by Monica Shores, ''Ms. Magazine''</ref> She also cited [[Conservapedia]] in her article and indicated: "The lack of lady presence is so visible that Conservapedia commented on it by noting that [[Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science website|Dawkins’ website]] overwhelmingly attracts male visitors."<ref>[http://msmagazine.com/blog/2010/11/01/will-new-atheism-make-room-for-women/ ''Will “New Atheism” Make Room For Women''] by Monica Shores, ''Ms. Magazine''</ref> |
| − |
| |
| − | There are atheists who are obsessed with Conservapedia and have Severe [[Essay: Conservapedia obsessive compulsive disorder|Conservapedia Obsessive Compulsive Disorder]] (SCOCD). Deep down they know that Conservapedia is playing a part inn shaping public opinion about atheism. It has gotten so bad that both Google and the website Abbreviations.com now recognize the mental disorder Conservapedia Obsessive Disorder (see: [[Essay: Conservapedia Obsessive Compulsive Disorder is an officially recognized mental disorder|Conservapedia Obsessive Compulsive Disorder is a recognized mental disorder by both Google and Abbreviations.com]]).
| |
| | | | |
| | In the last 10 years or so, negative views about atheists in the United States have sharpened (see: [[Views on atheists]]). According to the web traffic tracking company [[Alexa]], as of 11/2/2017, Conservapedia receives 62.3% of its web traffic from the United States.<ref>[https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/conservapedia.com Alexa- Conservapedia]</ref> Conservapedia has one the largest collection of articles on atheism on the internet. | | In the last 10 years or so, negative views about atheists in the United States have sharpened (see: [[Views on atheists]]). According to the web traffic tracking company [[Alexa]], as of 11/2/2017, Conservapedia receives 62.3% of its web traffic from the United States.<ref>[https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/conservapedia.com Alexa- Conservapedia]</ref> Conservapedia has one the largest collection of articles on atheism on the internet. |
| Line 47: |
Line 45: |
| | | | |
| | The findings of this most recent survey support the argument that atheists are persistent cultural outsiders in the United States because they are perceived to have rejected cultural values and practices understood as essential to private morality, civic virtue, and national identity. Moreover, any refusal to embrace a religious identity of any type is troubling for a large portion of Americans.<ref>[http://cla.umn.edu/news-events/news/atheists-remain-most-disliked-religious-minority-us Atheists Remain Most Disliked Religious Minority in the US]</ref>}} | | The findings of this most recent survey support the argument that atheists are persistent cultural outsiders in the United States because they are perceived to have rejected cultural values and practices understood as essential to private morality, civic virtue, and national identity. Moreover, any refusal to embrace a religious identity of any type is troubling for a large portion of Americans.<ref>[http://cla.umn.edu/news-events/news/atheists-remain-most-disliked-religious-minority-us Atheists Remain Most Disliked Religious Minority in the US]</ref>}} |
| | + | |
| | + | There are atheists who are obsessed with Conservapedia and have Severe [[Essay: Conservapedia obsessive compulsive disorder|Conservapedia Obsessive Compulsive Disorder]] (SCOCD). Deep down they know that Conservapedia is playing a part inn shaping public opinion about atheism. It has gotten so bad that both Google and the website Abbreviations.com now recognize the mental disorder Conservapedia Obsessive Disorder (see: [[Essay: Conservapedia Obsessive Compulsive Disorder is an officially recognized mental disorder|Conservapedia Obsessive Compulsive Disorder is a recognized mental disorder by both Google and Abbreviations.com]]). |
| | | | |
| | == Notes == | | == Notes == |