Changes

::::SamHB, they have found that promoting the idea that women are underrepresented in STEM fields and that this has to be corrected has the effect of telling women that STEM is not feminine/girly and thus women are more likely to avoid those fields. In other words, the policy is probably backfiring. See:  http://review.chicagobooth.edu/economics/2017/article/how-promoting-stem-fields-women-can-backfire

::::SamHB, they have found that promoting the idea that women are underrepresented in STEM fields and that this has to be corrected has the effect of telling women that STEM is not feminine/girly and thus women are more likely to avoid those fields. In other words, the policy is probably backfiring. See:  http://review.chicagobooth.edu/economics/2017/article/how-promoting-stem-fields-women-can-backfire

::::Women tend to be more likely to be conformists and not mavericks.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:43, 3 December 2017 (EST)

::::Women tend to be more likely to be conformists and not mavericks.

 

::::Over and over again, liberals fail to take into account the unintended consequences of their social engineering! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:48, 3 December 2017 (EST)

::Once Christian denominations filly embrace the notion of female pastors, their memberships almost invariably spiral downward. That should surely be mentioned in relation to "Christian feminism".  

::Once Christian denominations filly embrace the notion of female pastors, their memberships almost invariably spiral downward. That should surely be mentioned in relation to "Christian feminism".