Changes

|2011

|2011

|PG

|PG

|Contains a joke that could be interpreted as passing off bestiality as funny.

|This disturbing love story contains a joke that could be interpreted as passing off bestiality (in this case, with a garden gnome, which is normally an ''inanimate object'') as funny.

|$194 million

|$194 million

|-

|-

|2006

|2006

|PG

|PG

|An environmental theme movie that was pushing it a bit on sexual content and some mockery of Christian values. <ref name="6 Kids Films Filled with Green Propaganda">https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2014/3/22/6-kids-films-filled-with-green-propaganda/2/</ref>

|This environmentalist film pushes the envelope to some extent with sexual humor and implied persecution against Christians.<ref name="6 Kids Films Filled with Green Propaganda">https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2014/3/22/6-kids-films-filled-with-green-propaganda/2/</ref>

|$198,000,317

|$198,000,317

|-

|-

|2011

|2011

|PG

|PG

|The sequel to Happy Feet that even though it wasn't as bad on sexual content it was even worse than the first on environmentalism, as it pushed the global warming agenda. The second one also had very liberal actors Matt Damon and Brad Pitt in it who portrayed two krill who were implied to be homosexual.<ref name="6 Kids Films Filled with Green Propaganda" />

|Like the first ''Happy Feet'', it does not push the envelope too much as far as sexual humor goes, but it goes even further with themes of environmentalism as it pushes the global warming agenda. Staunch liberal actors Matt Damon and Brad Pitt voice two krill who are implied to be homosexual.<ref name="6 Kids Films Filled with Green Propaganda" />

|$64,006,466

|$64,006,466

|-

|-

|1996

|1996

|G

|G

|Released during liberal maniac [[Michael Eisner]]'s reign of terror at Disney, the film does everything in its power to demonize Christianity. The original source material was not supposed to be given to children, yet the Disney film was marketed as such to young audiences. In some cases, the film actually manages to be even more darker than the original book by Victor Hugo: originally, Quasimodo's vicious punishment at the hands of the Parisians during the Feast of Fools ceremony was out of corporal punishment; while in the Disney film, it had been done at the whim of the Parisians just for the sake of it. To make the film even darker, a gypsy genocide plot is introduced, and Paris was also the victim of arson late into the film. This is a stark contrast to most other Disney film adaptations, which have a history of toning down the original works (as in ''The Jungle Book'', in which Disney advised the writers to ignore the book specifically because its contents were unsuitable for children). Some mild language is present, too (namely the word "damnation" and "eternal damnation"). Worst of all, one of the male gargoyles falls in love with Djali, who is explicitly male, which means that liberals will subtly shoehorn the homosexual agenda into anything, even the gargoyles of Notre Dame.

|Released during liberal maniac [[Michael Eisner]]'s reign of terror at Disney, the film does everything in its power to persecute Christians. The original source material was not supposed to be given to children, yet the Disney film was marketed as such to young audiences. In some cases, the film actually manages to be even more darker than the original book by Victor Hugo: originally, Quasimodo's vicious punishment at the hands of the Parisians during the Feast of Fools ceremony was out of corporal punishment; while in the Disney film, it had been done at the whim of the Parisians just for the sake of it. To make the film even darker, a gypsy genocide plot is introduced, and Paris was also the victim of arson late into the film. This is a stark contrast to most other Disney film adaptations, which have a history of toning down the original works (as in ''The Jungle Book'', in which Disney advised the writers to ignore the book specifically because its contents were unsuitable for children). Some mild language is present, too (namely the word "damnation" and "eternal damnation"). Worst of all, one of the male gargoyles falls in love with Djali, who is explicitly male, which means that liberals will subtly shoehorn the homosexual agenda into anything, even the gargoyles of Notre Dame.

|$100,138,851

|$100,138,851

|-

|-

|1999

|1999

|Not Rated

|Not Rated

|This animation bastardizes a horrific, tragic historical event in the name of making an anti-whaling statement.

|This animation bastardizes a horrific, tragic historical event in the name of making a statement against the whaling industry.

|

|

|-

|-

|2014

|2014

|PG

|PG

|Promotes disorderly conduct and nonconformity, and one of the antagonists is a head businessman. It is also pro-environmentalism.

|An incorrigibly self-serving exiled squirrel finds himself helping his former park creatures survive by raiding a nut store, which celebrates disorderly conduct, nonconformity, and environmentalism. One of the antagonists is a head businessman because he does not comply with environmentalism.

|$64,251,541

|$64,251,541

|-

|-

|2017

|2017

|PG

|PG

|Sequel to the Nut Job, this time with the villain trying to build an amusement park.

|In the sequel to ''The Nut Job'', the businessman villain returns to try to build an amusement park, again persecuted for not being an environmentalist.

|$26,989,904 (Still in Theaters)

|$26,989,904 (Still in Theaters)

|-

|-

|2006

|2006

|PG

|PG

|Don't be fooled by the fact conservative star Gary Sinise is in it. This animated film is pro-environmentalism and anti-hunting.

|Although conservative star Gary Sinise appears, environmentalism and hate speech against hunters runs rampant.

|$85,105,259   

|$85,105,259   

|-

|-

|2006

|2006

|PG

|PG

|Based upon the comic strip of the same name, animals who are struggling to steal food from trash for the winter are the heroes, while humans are painted as ignorant, uncaring towards animals (clearly an environmentalist message), and obsessed with food. Plus, a businesswoman is the main antagonist, and an exterminator is vilified for simply doing his job.

|Based upon the comic strip of the same name, animals who are struggling to steal food from trash for the winter are the heroes, while humans are painted as ignorant, uncaring towards animals (clearly an environmentalist message), and obsessed with food. Plus, a businesswoman is the main antagonist, and an exterminator is scorned for simply doing his job.

|$155,019,340

|$155,019,340

|-

|-

|2012

|2012

|PG

|PG

|The very ending of the film pulls a swerve and reveals that one of the characters, Mitch Downe, as being homosexual, despite the fact that he was not even implied to be that throughout the movie. This decision had been made by the director Chris Butler.

|The very ending of the film pulls a swerve and reveals that one of the characters, Mitch Downe, as being homosexual, ignoring the fact that he was not even implied to be that earlier. This decision had been made by the director Chris Butler.

|$107.1 million

|$107.1 million

|-

|-

|1995

|1995

|G

|G

|Feminist story about [[Native American]] [[Pocahontas]] with an environmental message, and also the Native American’s view against English settlers (in a similar manner to Howard Zinn's revisionist history textbook ''A People's History of the United States'', which would eventually end up entering public knowledge and provided to all universities and high schools across America two years later [see above]). In addition, the titular character also enters what is implied to be an unfaithful relationship with John Smith over Kokoum that was treated in a comparatively positive light. It also displays the Pilgrims in neagtive light. Following the Best Picture nomination of ''Beauty and the Beast'' at the 64th Academy Awards and its subsequent loss in March 1992, then-studio chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg opted to produce another animated sweeping romantic epic in hopes of achieving the cinematic masterpiece status and replicating another Best Picture nomination, even if it meant to distort history and add both a love story and environmental themes. In fact, many people at Disney had high hopes for ''Pocahontas'', while deeming the concept of another film in production, ''The Lion King'' as experimental. As it turned out, ''The Lion King'' became one of the greatest animated motion pictures of all time, while ''Pocahontas'' received mixed critical reviews and below-than-expected box office receipts.

|This feminist story follows a highly fictionalized account of the life of [[Native American]] [[Pocahontas]] with an environmental message; and the Native American’s view against English settlers is a similar to Howard Zinn's revisionist history textbook ''A People's History of the United States'', which would entered public knowledge and provided to universities, colleges, and high schools across America two years later (see ''Good Will Hunting''). The titular character enters what is implied to be an unfaithful relationship with John Smith over fellow Native American Kokoum, and her decision is treated in a comparatively positive light; while Pilgrims are vilified simply for establishing the early American colonies to escape religious persecution back in England. Following the Best Picture nomination of ''Beauty and the Beast'' at the 64th Academy Awards and its subsequent loss in March 1992, then-studio chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg opted to produce another animated sweeping romantic epic in hopes of achieving a cinematic masterpiece status and replicating another Best Picture nomination, even if he intended to distort history and add both a love story and environmental themes. In fact, many people at Disney had high hopes for ''Pocahontas'', while deeming the concept of another film in production, ''The Lion King'' as experimental. To their surprise, ''The Lion King'' became one of the greatest animated motion pictures of all time, while ''Pocahontas'' received mixed critical reviews and below-than-expected box office receipts.

|$141,579,773

|$141,579,773

|-  

|-