58
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: +
no edit summary
::::One might think Bohdan had something against Islam. What about cultural imperialism? Chinese imperialism? Japanese imperialism? The imperialism of various central- and south-American ancient cultures and their imperialism? Zulu imperialism? Pre-Islamic middle-eastern and central Asian imperialism?--[[User:Olly|Olly]] 17:18, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
::::One might think Bohdan had something against Islam. What about cultural imperialism? Chinese imperialism? Japanese imperialism? The imperialism of various central- and south-American ancient cultures and their imperialism? Zulu imperialism? Pre-Islamic middle-eastern and central Asian imperialism?--[[User:Olly|Olly]] 17:18, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
:::::for the record i dont care about the religion of anyone. I think the article seems to imply that only Europe was imperialistic, when this is clearly not true.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
:::::for the record i dont care about the religion of anyone. I think the article seems to imply that only Europe was imperialistic, when this is clearly not true.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
::::Fair enough. I think the point is that Europeans - particularly Britain, France and Holland - were just the "''best''" at it. And as Rob Pommer said, Europeans colonised in the name of the state or the ruler - much like the Chinese or the Japanese.--[[User:Olly|Olly]] 17:23, 1 May 2007 (EDT)