| Line 87: |
Line 87: |
| | |Attorney Adam Bonner (Spencer Tracy) hilariously exposes his budding [[feminism|feminist]] wife Amanda's (Katharine Hepburn's) hypocritical double standards in the legal system. | | |Attorney Adam Bonner (Spencer Tracy) hilariously exposes his budding [[feminism|feminist]] wife Amanda's (Katharine Hepburn's) hypocritical double standards in the legal system. |
| | | | | | |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |''Adventures of the Wilderness Family'' |
| | + | |1975 |
| | + | |G |
| | + | |Big city-weary Los Angeles construction worker and his family pack it in for the Rockies, never to return. Followed by two sequels in 1978 and 1979. |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''Air Force One'' | | |''Air Force One'' |
| Line 306: |
Line 311: |
| | |1981 | | |1981 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |Based on the parallel lives of two British Olympians, devout Scottish Presbyterian [[Eric Liddell]], who wants to run for the glory of God, and Jewish Englishman [[Harold Abrahams] both struggle to overcome prejudice in 1924 Britain. That year's Olympics Games was especially spiritual when Liddell refused the Prince of Wales' request that he perform his competition on a Sunday. | + | |Based on the parallel lives of two British Olympians, devout Scottish Presbyterian [[Eric Liddell]], who wants to run for the glory of God, and Jewish Englishman [[Harold Abrahams]] both struggle to overcome prejudice in 1924 Britain. That year's Olympics Games was especially spiritual when Liddell refused the Prince of Wales' request that he perform his competition on a Sunday. |
| | |$58,972,904 | | |$58,972,904 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 318: |
Line 323: |
| | |2005 | | |2005 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |In this sequel to the pro-family original, the Baker family takes a vacation and competes against a rival family in a tournament. In the end, they realize family is what matters most. | + | |In this sequel to the pro-family remake, the Baker family takes a vacation and competes against a rival family in a tournament. In the end, they realize family is what matters most. |
| | |$82,571,173 | | |$82,571,173 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 498: |
Line 503: |
| | |2017 | | |2017 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| − | |From Christopher Nolan, director of the conservative ''Dark Knight'' Trilogy, tells the dramatization of Dunkirk evacuation. This action-packed adventure never derails in to political correctness and history revision as many liberal critics opened fire on the film for its lack of diversity and feminism.<ref>https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/melissa-mullins/2017/07/23/reminder-usa-today-critic-laments-dunkirk-lacks-gender-racial</ref>. | + | |From Christopher Nolan, director of the conservative ''Dark Knight'' Trilogy, tells the dramatization of the Dunkirk evacuation. This action-packed adventure never derails in to political correctness and history revision as many liberal critics opened fire on the film for its lack of diversity and feminism.<ref>https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/melissa-mullins/2017/07/23/reminder-usa-today-critic-laments-dunkirk-lacks-gender-racial</ref>. |
| | |$188 million | | |$188 million |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 540: |
Line 545: |
| | |2005 | | |2005 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| − | |The film is loosely based on the story of Anneliese Michel (Americanized to probably protect the identity of the deceased) in which a priest performed an exorcism that costs a young girl's life. The movie's villain is an [[atheist]] lawyer who tries to convict the priest for negligent homicide, rather than believe it was the work of [[Satan]]. | + | |The film is loosely based on the story of Anneliese Michel (Americanized to probably protect the identity of the deceased) in which a priest performed an exorcism that costs a young girl's life. The movie's villain is an [[atheist]] lawyer who tries to convict the priest of negligent homicide, rather than believe it was the work of [[Satan]]. |
| | |$75,072,454 | | |$75,072,454 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 546: |
Line 551: |
| | |1973 | | |1973 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |(''not for children'') - A portrayal of pure evil against a positive characterization of [[Christianity]]. It broke the record for movie revenue and had several sequels and imitators, e.g. ''[[The Omen]]'' in 1976 and its sequels. A 2016 TV series of the same name follows up on the events of the original film. | + | |(''not for children'') - A portrayal of pure evil against a positive characterization of [[Christianity]]. It broke the record for movie revenue and had several sequels and imitators, e.g. ''The Omen'' in 1976 and its sequels. A 2016 TV series of the same name follows up on the events of the original film. |
| | |$441,071,011 | | |$441,071,011 |
| | |- | | |- |