Changes

|}

|}

The actual thought experiment aiming to resolve this question consists in imagining a ''group of people'', a ''pattern'' subject of research, that would consider as ''normal'' and ''normative'' solely the [[homosexual]] behavior. If such norm would be applied onto all members of the ''tested group'', so that all of them would be ''"normalized"'' accordingly, the society that would adopt such twisted normative approach would simply ''die out'' or depend on ''unnatural methods'' of [[reproduction]].<ref>{{cite web |title=SODOM (documentary) |author=Arkady Mamontov |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usWLsblbFNU&feature=youtu.be&t=1092|pages=18min:14sec |quote=The Fertility Institute in L.A., this is the first clinic that offered the surrogacy to sodmites. |accessdate=14 Feb 2016}}</ref> The result of this [[experiment]] is predictable with ''absolute'' degree of certainty beyond any doubt. Same-sex relations are ''essentially'' sterile, intrinsically unfit for generation, while compatible opposite-sex relations are intrinsically generative and only ''accidentally'' infertile. There is nothing a same-sex couple could do at any time or in any way that would render their relations fertile. The opposite is true of the vast majority of compatible opposite-sex couples, who would actively have to do something to render their relations infertile.<ref name="Reilly2014">{{cite book |title=Making Gay Okay: How Rationalizing Homosexual Behavior is Changing Everything |author=Robert R. Reilly |publisher=Ignatius Press |place=San Francisco |pages=95, 100, 128 |isbn=978-1-58617-833-8 |url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rO-JTobNH80}}</ref>{{#tag:ref|Privations such as infertility, blindness, a missing arm. leg. etc. are accidental properties, not substantial. Accidental properties, such as privations, do not change the formal aspect of the subject. Just because a man is blind does not change the fact that he is a man, nor does it change the fact that the primary intelligible end of the eye is color and light. ... When a part fails to function properly we attempt to correct it rather than change our conceptualization of what it is altogether.<ref name="Reilly2014"/><ref name="Sorba2010">{{cite web |title=The Essence of Marriage: Rational-Charitable Marriage versus Hedonistic Prideful-Marriage |author=Ryan Sorba |publisher=Conservative Author, Activist, and TV News Personality |date=30 Sep 2010 |url=http://ryansorba.blogspot.com/2010/09/essence-of-marriage.html |accessdate=14 Feb 2016}}</ref>|group=note}} Therefore, the conclusive statement inevitably must be that not only the same-sex relationships do not secure the integrity of the society, but also act in counter-direction, endanger its very existence and disintegrate it. In order to maintain the sustainability of society, they must be left devoid of legal support with respect to any form of marriage, i.e. institution with a special status arranging i.a. the sexual relationships of humans and representing the conceptual framework for the [[family]] unit that is the basic building block of civilized society. Sodomites cannot make a society, nor keep ours going for very long. The legal disadvantages against sodomitical and other partnerships are there for the purpose of shaping behavior in a certain way to the general benefit of society and for discouraging behavior that undermines it.<ref name="Reilly2014"/> According to [[Nazi]] resister [[Dietrich Bonhoeffer]], state should regard for necessary to apply restrictions in the realms of marriage. These restrictions are not an act of arbitrariness or self-will, but rather outcome of fact that natural boundaries and choices are not sufficient safeguard against various blunders and errors that may cause serious harm to society and state. Thus, in order to maintain the [[Natural order]], it is inevitable to restrict and regulate the choices of citizens by positive state law.<ref name="Bonhoeffer:Ethik">{{cite book |title=Etika (Ethics, in the German original 'Ethik') |author=Dietrich Bonhoeffer |publisher=Kalich |place=Prague |year= 2007 |chapter=Přirozené (Natural) |pages=176–7 |language=Czech}}</ref>

The actual thought experiment aiming to resolve this question consists in imagining a ''group of people'', a ''pattern'' subject of research, that would consider as ''normal'' and ''normative'' solely the [[homosexual]] behavior. If such norm would be applied onto all members of the ''tested group'', so that all of them would be ''"normalized"'' accordingly, the society that would adopt such twisted normative approach would simply ''die out'' or depend on ''unnatural methods'' of [[reproduction]].<ref>{{cite web |title=SODOM (documentary) |author=Arkady Mamontov |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usWLsblbFNU&feature=youtu.be&t=1092|pages=18min:14sec |quote=The Fertility Institute in L.A., this is the first clinic that offered the surrogacy to sodmites. |accessdate=14 Feb 2016}}</ref> The result of this [[experiment]] is predictable with ''absolute'' degree of certainty beyond any doubt. Same-sex relations are ''essentially'' sterile, intrinsically unfit for generation, while compatible opposite-sex relations are intrinsically generative and only ''accidentally'' infertile. There is nothing a same-sex couple could do at any time or in any way that would render their relations fertile. The opposite is true of the vast majority of compatible opposite-sex couples, who would actively have to do something to render their relations infertile.<ref name="Reilly2014">{{cite book |title=Making Gay Okay: How Rationalizing Homosexual Behavior is Changing Everything |author=Robert R. Reilly |publisher=Ignatius Press |place=San Francisco |pages=95, 100, 128 |isbn=978-1-58617-833-8 |url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rO-JTobNH80}}</ref>{{#tag:ref|Privations such as infertility, blindness, a missing arm. leg. etc. are accidental properties, not substantial. Accidental properties, such as privations, do not change the formal aspect of the subject. Just because a man is blind does not change the fact that he is a man, nor does it change the fact that the primary intelligible end of the eye is color and light. ... When a part fails to function properly we attempt to correct it rather than change our conceptualization of what it is altogether.<ref name="Reilly2014"/><ref name="Sorba2010">{{cite web |title=The Essence of Marriage: Rational-Charitable Marriage versus Hedonistic Prideful-Marriage |author=Ryan Sorba |publisher=Conservative Author, Activist, and TV News Personality |date=30 Sep 2010 |url=http://ryansorba.blogspot.com/2010/09/essence-of-marriage.html |accessdate=14 Feb 2016}}</ref>|group=note}} Therefore, the conclusive statement inevitably must be that not only the same-sex relationships do not secure the integrity of the society, but also act in counter-direction, endanger its very existence and disintegrate it. In order to maintain the sustainability of society, they must be left devoid of legal support with respect to any form of marriage, i.e. institution with a special status arranging i.a. the sexual relationships of humans and representing the conceptual framework for the [[family]] unit that is the basic building block of civilized society. Sodomites cannot make a society, nor keep ours going for very long. The legal disadvantages against sodomitical and other partnerships are there for the purpose of shaping behavior in a certain way to the general benefit of society and for discouraging behavior that undermines it.<ref name="Reilly2014"/> According to [[Nazi]] resister [[Dietrich Bonhoeffer]], state should regard for necessary to apply restrictions in the realms of marriage. These restrictions are not an act of arbitrariness or self-will, but rather outcome of fact that natural boundaries and choices are not sufficient safeguard against various blunders and errors that may cause serious harm to society and state. Thus, in order to maintain the [[Natural order]], it is inevitable to restrict and regulate the choices of citizens by positive state law.<ref name="Bonhoeffer:Ethik">{{cite book |title=Etika (Ethics, in the German original 'Ethik') |author=Dietrich Bonhoeffer |publisher=Kalich |place=Prague |year= 2007 |chapter=Přirozené (Natural) |pages=176–7 |language=Czech}}</ref>