Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
186 bytes added ,  19:52, January 1, 2018
→‎Non-economic zero-sum games: correct prediction by social conservatives
Line 2: Line 2:  
==Non-economic zero-sum games==
 
==Non-economic zero-sum games==
 
*Social [[conservatives]] recognize that [[rights]] are a zero-sum game.  As Bill Borst states, "I say that anytime that a new right is born, in the zero sum game of life, it impinges the freedom of another."<ref>[http://bbprof.wordpress.com/2010/11/18/the-new-three-rs/ The New Three R's], by Bill Borst</ref>
 
*Social [[conservatives]] recognize that [[rights]] are a zero-sum game.  As Bill Borst states, "I say that anytime that a new right is born, in the zero sum game of life, it impinges the freedom of another."<ref>[http://bbprof.wordpress.com/2010/11/18/the-new-three-rs/ The New Three R's], by Bill Borst</ref>
−
**An example of this is the [[homosexual agenda]], as "LGBT+" activists demand new "rights" for themselves at the expense of the [[religious freedom]] of Christians and other social conservatives
+
**An example of this is the [[homosexual agenda]], as "LGBT+" activists demand new "rights" for themselves at the expense of the [[religious freedom]] of Christians and other social conservatives. As social conservatives correctly predicted, it is not possible to expand rights to cover both the additional "rights" that homosexuals demand and the religious freedom of cake bakers.
    
==See also==
 
==See also==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,026

edits

Navigation menu