Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
17 bytes added ,  15:00, January 3, 2018
m
Line 4: Line 4:     
== Criticism of classifying [[Christianity]] as a species of genus religion ==
 
== Criticism of classifying [[Christianity]] as a species of genus religion ==
−
There are scholars like [[Visser't Hooft]] who resist the notion of [[Christianity]] as a "species of the [[genus]] religion." He argues that Christianity is an "adequate and definitive [[Revelation (religion)|revelation]] of [[God]] in history," that classifying Christianity as one expression of "a general phenomenon called religion is to set it in a framework which is foreign to its nature. In differentiating the world religions from the world of revelation, Jean Danielou says, "The worst misunderstanding of Christianity or of [[Judaism]] is to make them religions among other religions — the very error of [[syncretism]]."<ref name="Christopaganism">{{cite book
+
There are scholars like [[Visser't Hooft]] who resist the notion of [[Christianity]] as a ''"species of the [[genus]] religion."'' He argues that Christianity is an ''"adequate and definitive [[Revelation (religion)|revelation]] of [[God]] in history,"'' that classifying Christianity as one expression of ''"a general phenomenon called religion is to set it in a framework which is foreign to its nature."'' In differentiating the world religions from the world of revelation, Jean Danielou says, ''"The worst misunderstanding of Christianity or of [[Judaism]] is to make them religions among other religions — the very error of [[syncretism]]."''<ref name="Christopaganism">{{cite book
 
|title=Christopaganism or Indigenous Christianity?
 
|title=Christopaganism or Indigenous Christianity?
 
|author=Alan R. Tippet
 
|author=Alan R. Tippet
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,947

edits

Navigation menu