| Line 99: |
Line 99: |
| | Note that, for physically tangible, sublight situations, <math>\gamma > 1</math> always. So <i>multiplying</i> something by the Lorentz factor will <i>increase</i> the quantity while <i>dividing</i> by it will <i>decrease</i> the quantity. | | Note that, for physically tangible, sublight situations, <math>\gamma > 1</math> always. So <i>multiplying</i> something by the Lorentz factor will <i>increase</i> the quantity while <i>dividing</i> by it will <i>decrease</i> the quantity. |
| | | | |
| − | ==Faster Than Light== | + | ===Faster Than Light=== |
| | | | |
| | Conventionally, faster than light travel is regarded as impossible. The reasoning is the insurmountable barrier that is the speed of light in the Lorentz factor, as detailed above. | | Conventionally, faster than light travel is regarded as impossible. The reasoning is the insurmountable barrier that is the speed of light in the Lorentz factor, as detailed above. |
| Line 129: |
Line 129: |
| | so <i>negative</i> time has passed; the tachyon seems to have arrived before it left, and so has moved back in time according to one of the available reference frames. This creates obvious potential for paradox. | | so <i>negative</i> time has passed; the tachyon seems to have arrived before it left, and so has moved back in time according to one of the available reference frames. This creates obvious potential for paradox. |
| | | | |
| − | This possibility of effect precluding cause indicates that, if tachyons truly existed, then there may be no free will, and actions would always be pre-determined. Otherwise, one observer may have an "early warning" of something that will happen in another observer's frame and somehow change it; but then special relativity has it that all reference must agree on whether a spacetime event occurring at all or not: no in-between. | + | This possibility of effect precluding cause indicates that, if tachyons truly existed, then there may be no free will, and actions would always be pre-determined. Otherwise, one observer may have an "early warning" of something that will happen in another observer's frame and somehow change it; but then special relativity has it that observers in all reference frames must agree on whether a spacetime event occurring at all or not: no in-between. |
| | | | |
| | This would create a time travel paradox, so it is thought that one would not be allowed to change the past, regardless of wishes; one's actions would be pre-determined, not freely chosen at will. Dr. Richard Muller vividly illustrates this in his "tachyon murder paradox," commenting that it gives him personal reason to wish faster than light travel impossible.<ref>Dr. Richard Muller "Tachyon Murder Paradox" - https://www.quora.com/Will-humans-ever-develop-faster-than-light-travel</ref> | | This would create a time travel paradox, so it is thought that one would not be allowed to change the past, regardless of wishes; one's actions would be pre-determined, not freely chosen at will. Dr. Richard Muller vividly illustrates this in his "tachyon murder paradox," commenting that it gives him personal reason to wish faster than light travel impossible.<ref>Dr. Richard Muller "Tachyon Murder Paradox" - https://www.quora.com/Will-humans-ever-develop-faster-than-light-travel</ref> |