447
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + + + + + + +
Debate:Do we all know what Democrat Presidential candidates stand for yet? (view source)
Revision as of 02:48, May 2, 2007
, 02:48, May 2, 2007no edit summary
If your word is your bond, than yes, it is wrong to change your position. Especially, if it involves other peoples lives.--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 20:55, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
If your word is your bond, than yes, it is wrong to change your position. Especially, if it involves other peoples lives.--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 20:55, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
Well, new issues could arise before November 2008, but I think you were talking about Iraq: the truth is the government acted on faulty intelligence, and Bush and Co. were more than happy to sweep any unfortunate inconsistencies under the carpet, now congress knows they've been lied to, that's why they've changed their position (of course the high casualty rate is a here factor as well)
I had no trouble finding what the democrats stand for, it's right here on the internet: their platforms include reforming and improving higher education, withdrawal from Iraq (they share this with some republicans), introducing universal health care, switching to different energy sources than oil (they share this with some republicans), and restoring America's image in the world.
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]