Changes

Talk:Harvard abortion study (view source)

Revision as of 04:19, May 2, 2007

849 bytes added , 04:19, May 2, 2007

Line 130: Line 130:

:I was wondering if I should keep waiting for a response to my take on the study ... [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 14:26, 1 May 2007 (EDT)

+

: Point 1: No, the follow-up excluded women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.

+

: Point 2: Omitting those who left that question blank is unhelpful. What needs to be disclosed, and wasn't, is what happens when those who left the question blank are counted as having had an abortion. Also, see my reply below to Britinme.

+

: Point 3: The results are meaningless if the ethnic groups having the highest rates of abortion are omitted. At a minimum, this flaw should be disclosed to the reader and the public, rather than misleading them to think the conclusions apply to all Americans.

+

: Point 4: There is a huge difference between a miscarriage and an abortion. A miscarriage is natural, and an abortion is not. No one would expect the health consequences to be the same, and they aren't.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:19, 2 May 2007 (EDT)

== Age of Participants ==

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,393

edits

Changes

Talk:Harvard abortion study (view source)

Revision as of 04:19, May 2, 2007

Navigation menu

Search