Changes

|1960

|1960

|Not Rated

|Not Rated

|A series of Hollywood-perpetuated lies about the [[Scopes Trial]] in this film in order to smear Christianity, including: portraying [[William Jennings Bryan]] as ignorant, harsh, and punitive, based on an incorrect of his actions and testimony; falsely claiming that, at the end, Bryan, in a senseless fit of madness, died in the courtroom amid "caring" and "reasonable" [[Darwin]]ists; and wrongfully depicting Darwinists in a positive light and Christians as "deceitful". In real life, Bryan and the Christians won the trial and were charitable to the end, while the Darwinist Darrow was deceitful in reneging on his deal to take the witness stand after Bryan did.  

|This historical revisionist drama contains a series of Hollywood-perpetuated lies about the [[Scopes Trial]] to smear Christianity, including: portraying [[William Jennings Bryan]] as ignorant, harsh, and punitive, based on an incorrect of his actions and testimony; falsely claiming that, at the end, Bryan, in a senseless fit of madness, died in the courtroom amid "caring" and "reasonable" [[Darwin]]ists; and wrongfully depicting Darwinists in a positive light and Christians as "deceitful". In real life, Bryan and the Christians won the trial and were charitable to the end, while the Darwinist Darrow was deceitful in reneging on his deal to take the witness stand after Bryan did.  

|

|

|-

|-

|1999

|1999

|R

|R

|The prominent historical figure Joan of Arc is psychologically and emotionally unstable, impulsive, prone to mood swings, and leads the French army to victory purely out of selfishness, cruelty, and vengeance, despite all historical evidence proving the contrary. Evidently, this film was made to criticize Roman Catholicism.

|The prominent historical figure Joan of Arc is psychologically and emotionally unstable, impulsive, and prone to mood swings, so she leads the French army to victory purely out of selfishness, cruelty, and vengeance. However, historical evidence proves the contrary. Evidently, this film was made to criticize Roman Catholicism.

|$66,976,317

|$66,976,317

|-

|-

|1983

|1983

|R

|R

|It's ninety minutes of absurdist, godless existentialism by the staunchly nonreligious British troupe Monty Python. Need we say more?

|It's ninety minutes of absurdist, godless existentialism with a sacrilegious person's view of [[Heaven]] at the end by the staunchly nonreligious British troupe Monty Python. Need we say more?

|$14,929,552

|$14,929,552

|-

|-

|2017

|2017

|R

|R

|Just when you thought Hollywood couldn't sink any lower. They go out and make a bio-flick about [[Madalyn Murray O'Hair]] (responsible for ending official Bible-reading in American public schools in 1963 [[Atheism and Mass Murder|which ended up with disastrous results liberals refuse to talk about]]) and not surprisingly turn her into a martyr.

|This biographical drama sympathizes with [[Madalyn Murray O'Hair]], who is responsible for ending official Bible-reading in American public schools in 1963 ([[Atheism and Mass Murder|and disastrous results that liberals refuse to talk about]]), and not surprisingly turns her into a martyr.

|

|

|-

|-

|2013

|2013

|R

|R

|A rip off the psycho lover plot from other films (ex. Fatal Attraction), this film makes the manic a Mormon.

|Copying the deranged lover plot device from other films (ex. Fatal Attraction), this film makes the maniac a Mormon.

|

|

|-  

|-  

|2014

|2014

|PG-13

|PG-13

|In a liberal take on the classic story from the [[Book of Genesis]], liberals, going along with their usual ''modus operandi'', they shoehorn in harmful messages that had nothing to do with the original story, such as [[environmentalism]], living on a vegan diet, and most notably, insisting that the [[Theory of Evolution]] is "fact". In addition, many traits of the "antagonists" appeared to be more Biblical than those of the "protagonists".<ref>Patterson, Roger & Chaffey, Tim (March 29, 2014). [https://answersingenesis.org/noahs-ark/noah-movie-detailed-review/ The ''Noah'' Movie: Our Detailed Review]. ''Answers in Genesis''. Retrieved August 9, 2016.</ref>

|In a liberal take on the classic story from the [[Book of Genesis]], liberals, going along with their usual ''modus operandi'', shoehorn in harmful messages that had nothing to do with the original story, such as [[environmentalism]], living on a vegan diet, and most notably, insisting that the [[Theory of Evolution]] is "fact". In addition, many traits of the "antagonists" appeared to be more Biblical than those of the "protagonists".<ref>Patterson, Roger & Chaffey, Tim (March 29, 2014). [https://answersingenesis.org/noahs-ark/noah-movie-detailed-review/ The ''Noah'' Movie: Our Detailed Review]. ''Answers in Genesis''. Retrieved August 9, 2016.</ref>

|$101,200,044

|$101,200,044

|-

|-