Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2 bytes removed ,  01:29, January 18, 2018
Altered some pronouns
Line 19: Line 19:  
Dr Money believed that there was a period of babyhood when sexual identity was undecided- a 'gender gate' - which lasted up to the age of two. During that period, he argued, if the parents chose the sex of the child, the way they brought it up would determine the child's gender, not its physical characteristics. Until this point, Dr Money had never put his controversial theory into practice with a non-intersex child. In the Reimers he had the perfect and unplanned opportunity to do so: a set of identical twins, two biological boys, one of whom could be raised a girl.
 
Dr Money believed that there was a period of babyhood when sexual identity was undecided- a 'gender gate' - which lasted up to the age of two. During that period, he argued, if the parents chose the sex of the child, the way they brought it up would determine the child's gender, not its physical characteristics. Until this point, Dr Money had never put his controversial theory into practice with a non-intersex child. In the Reimers he had the perfect and unplanned opportunity to do so: a set of identical twins, two biological boys, one of whom could be raised a girl.
   −
Janet Reimer wrote to Dr Money of Brenda's progress and once a year the whole family visited him in Baltimore. When Brenda was five Dr Money started to publish her case - disguising her by referring to her as Joan/John - in his books. The case became a sensation. It was the proof that certain extreme feminists in particular were looking for.  
+
Janet Reimer wrote to Dr Money of Brenda's progress and once a year the whole family visited him in Baltimore. When Brenda/Bruce was five Dr Money started to write about the experiment - referring to him as Joan/John - in his books. The case became a sensation. It was the proof that certain extreme feminists in particular were looking for.  
 
Widely cited in many text books, the case was a landmark study - hailed as proof of the overwhelming force of nurture - in spite of increasing evidence that hormones both in the womb and throughout a child's life, play a huge part in an individual's perception of themselves as masculine or feminine.
 
Widely cited in many text books, the case was a landmark study - hailed as proof of the overwhelming force of nurture - in spite of increasing evidence that hormones both in the womb and throughout a child's life, play a huge part in an individual's perception of themselves as masculine or feminine.
  
SkipCaptcha
965

edits

Navigation menu