Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,368
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: + + + +
Talk:Conservative companies (view source)
Revision as of 22:26, January 22, 2018
, 22:26, January 22, 2018→Brand vs parent name: new section
::Ummm..."hold the phone." I got something messed up in research. That's why this didn't sound right--it wasn't. Thanks. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 14:44, 22 January 2018 (EST)
::Ummm..."hold the phone." I got something messed up in research. That's why this didn't sound right--it wasn't. Thanks. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 14:44, 22 January 2018 (EST)
== Brand vs parent name ==
Opinion question: What should we do when there is a conservative parent company, and thus multiple brands under them are as well? For example, Taco Bell is a brand which is conservative. However, this is because its parent company, "YUM! Brands" is conservative. This parent company also owns KFC and Long John Silver, which are therefore conservative as well. Is it best to be concise by listing the parent company (perhaps with some well-know child brands listed parenthetically) as I have been doing, or would it be better to list the well-known brands separately, then perhaps include the parent in parentheses? This would take more space, but might be more user-friendly. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 17:26, 22 January 2018 (EST)