303
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: + +
Talk:Patterns of biological evolution (view source)
Revision as of 13:17, May 2, 2007
, 13:17, May 2, 2007no edit summary
This sounds like breaking news to me. The journal article is less than 3 years old, which means it's either a new theory or it's the first time anyone has found evidence for an old theory. (Or maybe we need to do a little more digging and write the article better.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 08:19, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
This sounds like breaking news to me. The journal article is less than 3 years old, which means it's either a new theory or it's the first time anyone has found evidence for an old theory. (Or maybe we need to do a little more digging and write the article better.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 08:19, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
:The first recorded instance of work of this kind is 1878. That probably ''is'' breaking news to the our up-to-the-minute-science creationists ;). [[User:Nematocyte|Nematocyte]] 09:17, 2 May 2007 (EDT)