Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
show the scientific evidence, if any
Line 17: Line 17:     
:I cited three peer reviewed articles. [[User:Nematocyte|Nematocyte]] 10:24, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
 
:I cited three peer reviewed articles. [[User:Nematocyte|Nematocyte]] 10:24, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Good. Now summarize them. Do not act as the [[Kyoto Protocol]] supporters do, and claim that something is "supported" by scientists. Actually show the scientific evidence, if any, those scientists have offered which support the theory in question. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 10:30, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
    
:Ed, did you look at the 7 research papers I gave on your talk page about scientific findings of divergent evolution?  I hope you are not misunderstanding the term divergent with macroevolution.  If so then it is understandable why you are refusing to address the evidence.  Look at my description of divergent evolution and then look at my description on the macroevolution page.  You will see that there is a fundamental difference in the two terms.  Divergent evolution can be applied as what happens when a bacterium mutates to have an antibiotic resistance and its progeny have the same resistance.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 10:29, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
 
:Ed, did you look at the 7 research papers I gave on your talk page about scientific findings of divergent evolution?  I hope you are not misunderstanding the term divergent with macroevolution.  If so then it is understandable why you are refusing to address the evidence.  Look at my description of divergent evolution and then look at my description on the macroevolution page.  You will see that there is a fundamental difference in the two terms.  Divergent evolution can be applied as what happens when a bacterium mutates to have an antibiotic resistance and its progeny have the same resistance.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 10:29, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu