Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 48:
Line 48: + +
t's not for a trustworthy encyclopedia like ours to present cutting-edge research
: You said the MM experiment was an "attempt to detect the absolute motion of the Earth through space". No, it was an attempt to measure motion of Earth relative to the aether. You said relativity postulates that space and time are distorted to make the Earth appear stationary. No, that's not right either. If you think that you have a valid view, then show me an example of one person who understands freshman physics and agrees with you. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 11:40, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
: You said the MM experiment was an "attempt to detect the absolute motion of the Earth through space". No, it was an attempt to measure motion of Earth relative to the aether. You said relativity postulates that space and time are distorted to make the Earth appear stationary. No, that's not right either. If you think that you have a valid view, then show me an example of one person who understands freshman physics and agrees with you. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 11:40, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
::Many people have tried to create a [[Theory of everything]]. It's not for a trustworthy encyclopedia like ours to present cutting-edge research like that. [[Paradigm shift]]s in science can take decades. Let's just write up what we already know. Then later, if there's time, we can describe recent (possible) breakthroughs. Fair enough? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:43, 2 May 2007 (EDT)