Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
22 bytes added ,  15:52, February 14, 2018
no edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:  
On June 27, 2016, Kennedy cast the decisive vote in favor of [[abortion]] clinics,  thereby giving [[pro-abort]]s everything they wanted to overturn [[pro-life]] provisions, in the case of ''[[Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt]]''.
 
On June 27, 2016, Kennedy cast the decisive vote in favor of [[abortion]] clinics,  thereby giving [[pro-abort]]s everything they wanted to overturn [[pro-life]] provisions, in the case of ''[[Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt]]''.
   −
Before siding completely with abortion, Kennedy had previously cast the deciding vote in support of a narrowed affirmance of [[abortion]] rights in 1992, in [[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]].  Between then and 2015, Kennedy's only votes for abortion were in denying certiorari on [[pro-life]] petitions. At oral argument in the ''Hobby Lobby'' case on March 25, Justice Kennedy was critical of the possibility of the government requiring corporations to fund [[abortion]].  Uncertain until 2016 about whether Kennedy would rule for them, pro-aborts typically did not appeal their court losses to the Supreme Court, perhaps fearing that Justice Kennedy will cast the deciding vote against them and thereby establish a pro-life precedent nationwide.  With Kennedy on their side now, abortion clinics are expected to seek to overturn numerous pro-life laws, beginning with a lawsuit in Louisiana merely a few days after the Supreme Court ruled.
+
Before siding completely with abortion, Kennedy had previously cast the deciding vote in support of a narrowed affirmance of [[abortion]] rights in 1992, in [[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]].  Between then and 2015, Kennedy's only votes for abortion were in denying certiorari on [[pro-life]] petitions. At oral argument in the ''[[Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores]]'' case on March 25, Justice Kennedy was critical of the possibility of the government requiring corporations to fund [[abortion]].  Uncertain until 2016 about whether Kennedy would rule for them, pro-aborts typically did not appeal their court losses to the Supreme Court, perhaps fearing that Justice Kennedy will cast the deciding vote against them and thereby establish a pro-life precedent nationwide.  With Kennedy on their side now, abortion clinics are expected to seek to overturn numerous pro-life laws, beginning with a lawsuit in Louisiana merely a few days after the Supreme Court ruled.
    
Justice Kennedy authored all three of the Supreme Court decisions which have advanced the [[homosexual agenda]].<ref>The three decisions are ''Romer'', ''Lawrence'', and ''Windsor''.</ref>  He was also the decisive vote and wrote the 5-4 opinion in favor of direct corporate spending on ads in campaigns, in ''Citizens United v. FEC'', 130 S. Ct. 876 (2010).
 
Justice Kennedy authored all three of the Supreme Court decisions which have advanced the [[homosexual agenda]].<ref>The three decisions are ''Romer'', ''Lawrence'', and ''Windsor''.</ref>  He was also the decisive vote and wrote the 5-4 opinion in favor of direct corporate spending on ads in campaigns, in ''Citizens United v. FEC'', 130 S. Ct. 876 (2010).
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035

edits

Navigation menu