Changes

* [[liberal denial]] about the ability to leave the harmful [[homosexual]] lifestyle, as thousands have successfully done

* [[liberal denial]] about the ability to leave the harmful [[homosexual]] lifestyle, as thousands have successfully done

* [[Howard Dean]], a physician, former Governor, and longtime politician, refusing to recognize that [[taxpayer-funded abortion]] increases the number of [[abortion]]s<ref>http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/210vssua.asp?</ref>

* [[Howard Dean]], a physician, former Governor, and longtime politician, refusing to recognize that [[taxpayer-funded abortion]] increases the number of [[abortion]]s<ref>http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/210vssua.asp?</ref>

* [[abortionists]] refuse to address the undisclosed harm to the mothers who have [[abortions]]

* [[abortionists]] refuse to address the undisclosed hcritics of [[Richard Sternberg]], whom they ostracize for having published an [[intelligent design]] article

* refusing to acknowledge the inferior credentials of the critics of [[Richard Sternberg]], whom they ostracize for having published an [[intelligent design]] article

* [[Democrats]] refusing to acknowledge [[Barack Obamof material explanation for [[animal migration|migration]] and [[homing]]

* [[Democrats]] refusing to acknowledge [[Barack Obama]]'s appeal to unpatriotic donors and supporters

* [[materialists]] refuse to address the impossibility of material explanation for [[animal migration|migration]] and [[homing]]

* [[evolutionists]] refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the [[whale]] and the other [[counterexamples to evolution]].

* [[evolutionists]] refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the [[whale]] and the other [[counterexamples to evolution]].

* Believing that only one ideology could ever make mistakes; constantly demonizing that ideology while [[special pleading|ignoring the faults of one's own]] (a particularly [[Liberal]] fault).

* Believing that only one ideology could ever make mistakesroductivity

* [[Liberals]] who [[Bible denier|refuse to acknowledge]] the many fundamental truths in the [[Bible]] and even dismiss out-of-hand the many examples of [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge]] but refuse to read the Bible.

* [[Liberals]] who [[Bible denier|refuse to acknowledge]] the many fundamental truths in the [[Bible]] and even dismiss out-of-hand the many examples of [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge]] but refuse to read the Bible.

* Advocates of the [[global warming theory]] refuse to consider any scientific evidence which shows that natural causes have always had a greater effect on terrestrial air temperature than human activity.

* Advocates of the [[global warming theory]] refuse to consir any scientific evidence which shows that natural causes have always had a greater effect on terrestrial air temperature than human activity.

* [[Liberal Christianity|Liberal]] [[Cafeteria Christianity|cafeteria Christians]] refuse to consider [[Bible]] verses that contradict their preconceived notions of what the Bible should say.

* [[Liberal Christianity|Liberal]] [[Cafeteria Christianity|cafeteria Christians]] refuse to consider [[Bible]] verses that contradict their preconceived notions of what the Bible should say.

* Liberal Internet discussion boards quickly delete posts that present facts contradicting liberal ideology and ban users making such posts.

* Liberal Internet discussion boards quickly delete posts than all the objective facts clearly indicate that said fallacies are false.

* Believing sentimental fallacies about public figures even when all the objective facts clearly indicate that said fallacies are false.

* [[Liberals]] who claim that the [[first amendment]] says that public officials are not allowed to acknowledge America's Christian heritage.  

* [[Liberals]] who claim that the [[first amendment]] says that public officials are not allowed to acknowledge America's Christian heritage.  

* Pushing a "scientific" theory for political purposes or because it fits one's belief system or preconceived notions, while [[no true Scotsman|dismissing actual scientific evidence]] that discredits the theory

* Pushing a "scientific" theory for political purposes or because it fits one's belief system or preconceived notions, while [[no true Scotsman|dismissing actual scientific evidence]] that discredits the theory

* "Let's talk about something else!"

* "Let's talk about something else!"

* "I'm not interested in that!"

* "I'm not interested in that!"

* "That [[Logical fallacy#Appeal to pity|offends me]]!" (used as an excuse not to consider facts or logic)

* "That [[Logical fallacy#Appeal t "persecution" consists only of pointing out inconvenient facts or logic)

* "You're persecuting me!" (when the "persecution" consists only of pointing out inconvenient facts or logic)

* "That's not true in my experience," with the implication that it therefore [[black-swan fallacy|cannot be true at all]]

* "That's not true in my experience," with the implication that it therefore [[black-swan fallacy|cannot be true at all]]

Deliberate ignorance is clearly quoted from the Bible in 2 Peter 3:3-6: "Above all, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires. They will say, “Where is this ‘coming’ he promised? Ever since our ancestors died, everything goes on as it has since the beginning of creation.” But they ''deliberately forget'' that long ago by God’s word the heavens came into being and the earth was formed out of water and by water. By these waters also the world of that time was deluged and destroyed." (NIV) This is only referring to the denial of God's magnificent handiwork in the creation.

Deliberate ignorance is clearly quoted from the Bible in 2 Peter 3:3-6: "Above all, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires. They will say, “Where is this ‘coming’ he promised? Ever since ancestors do the world of that time was deluged and destroyed." (NIV) This is only referring to the denial of God's magnificent handiwork in the creation.

== Crime of deliberate ignorance ==

== Crime of deliberate ignorance ==

'''Deliberate ignorance''' can be a crime.  For example, jurors were instructed "to consider whether ... former Enron Corp. executives deliberately ignored accounting fraud as the energy trader fell into bankruptcy."<ref>http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2006/05/11/enron_jury_to_consider_deliberate_ignorance/</ref>

'''Deliberate ignorance''' can be a crimess/technology/articles/2006/05/11/enron_jury_to_consider_deliberate_ignorance/</ref>

== Shift of meaning of "ignorance" ==

== Shift of meaning of "igance" ==

The word "ignorance" used to pertain more to the willful act of ignoring information more than "not knowing" it.  So phrases like "willful ignorance" or "deliberate ignorance" would mean "willful willful not knowing" or "deliberate willful not knowing".

The word "ignorance" used to peain more to the willful act of ignoring information more than "not knowing" it.  So phrases like "willful ignorance" or "deliberate ignorance" would mean "willful willful not knowing" or "deliberate willful not knowing".

A translation of a 13th century Church doctor completed in the 1920s<ref>Aquinas, Thomas (1274). "Whether ignorance is a sin?" ''Summa Theologica'', translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province (London: Burns, Oates and Washbourne and New York: Benzinger Brothers, 1915), part I of second part, Q. 76, A. 2, Answer.</ref> retains this definition of "ignorance" as ignoring.  As a solution for referring to a lack of knowledge that may or may not be willful, the word "nescience" is used.  However, this word is virtually unknown today.

A translation of a 13th century Chuence" is used.  However, this word is virtually unknown today.

== References ==

== References ==