Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
59 bytes added ,  19:09, May 2, 2007
m
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
{{merge|peer review}}
 
{{merge|peer review}}
−
'''Sham peer review''' is a growing problem in hospitals that misuse peer review to discipline and even exclude physicians from their medical staffs {{fact}}. Sham peer review includes anticompetitive manipulation of peer review to eliminate popular physicians from the market, or to retaliate against physicians who are outspoken in favor of improved patient care {{fact}}.   
+
'''Sham peer review''' is a growing problem in [[hospital]]s that misuse [[peer review]] to discipline and even exclude [[physician]]s from their medical staffs {{fact}}. Sham peer review includes anticompetitive manipulation of peer review to eliminate popular physicians from the [[market]], or to [[retaliate]] against physicians who are outspoken in favor of improved patient care {{fact}}.   
 +
 
 +
Hospitals have incentives to conceal and cover up errors in order to avoid [[malpractice]] cases.  Physicians are deterred from reporting errors out of fear of sham peer review {{fact}}. The Tampa Tribune (12/28, Gentry) reported that over 80 percent of a one-year's sample of a type of patient safety error was never reported to the  state of [[Florida]], even though reporting was required by law.{{fact}}
 +
 
 +
==References==
 +
<references/>
   −
Hospitals have incentives to conceal and cover up errors in order to avoid malpractice cases.  Physicians are deterred from reporting errors out of fear of sham peer review {{fact}}. The Tampa Tribune (12/28, Gentry) reported that over 80 percent of a one-year's sample of a type of patient safety error was never reported to the  state of Florida, even though reporting was required by law.{{fact}}
   
[[category:science]]
 
[[category:science]]
1,912

edits

Navigation menu