Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: + + + + + + + + + +
→Teamwork: new section
::I am glad to see that you are finding things to do here! I would like to note, however, that you should make an effort to work with others better. Conservapedia is designed to provide "[[best of the public]]" content, which is created by all of us working to make it the best it can be. As a result, people edit what others have written, in a effort to make it as good as possible. Reverting the work of others is not desirable, but is sometimes necessary if the majority of the contributors think that a change is not beneficial. We also talk with each other, either on the wiki or by email, to offer suggestions and advice, or ask the opinions of others.
::I am glad to see that you are finding things to do here! I would like to note, however, that you should make an effort to work with others better. Conservapedia is designed to provide "[[best of the public]]" content, which is created by all of us working to make it the best it can be. As a result, people edit what others have written, in a effort to make it as good as possible. Reverting the work of others is not desirable, but is sometimes necessary if the majority of the contributors think that a change is not beneficial. We also talk with each other, either on the wiki or by email, to offer suggestions and advice, or ask the opinions of others.
::The point is, we all need to collaborate in order to offer great articles to our readers. We welcome your suggestions and advice, and do encourage you to offer it in a good-faith, cordial way. However, we also ask that you listen to the suggestions and requests of others, who wish you well, but see things differently due to their experience or knowledge of Conservapedia. There are many issues which are subjective and matters of judgement. However, issues relating to CP's rules and guidelines are really non-negotiable. Please accept constructive criticism in the way it is intended--not accusatory, but an effort to help you improve, so you can help Conservapedia improve and serve its readers. Thank you again! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 16:04, 10 March 2018 (EST)
::The point is, we all need to collaborate in order to offer great articles to our readers. We welcome your suggestions and advice, and do encourage you to offer it in a good-faith, cordial way. However, we also ask that you listen to the suggestions and requests of others, who wish you well, but see things differently due to their experience or knowledge of Conservapedia. There are many issues which are subjective and matters of judgement. However, issues relating to CP's rules and guidelines are really non-negotiable. Please accept constructive criticism in the way it is intended--not accusatory, but an effort to help you improve, so you can help Conservapedia improve and serve its readers. Thank you again! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 16:04, 10 March 2018 (EST)
== Teamwork ==
Hello Quidam65, please read [[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Teamwork]].
Your edits have been constructive (including your turning certain pages into redirects, as we have said many times already), but your attitude needs improvement. We kindly asked you to warn us first when choosing to merge so many long-standing pages together. We also gave you other tips for improvement, like we do for every new editor here. However, you (unlike the most of the other editors we have messaged) appear to have taken these tips as personal attacks.[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&diff=1407610&oldid=1405672][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Campaign_to_make_Conservapedia_unusable&oldid=1407757] You even made at least (false) personal attack solely against me.[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&diff=1401744&oldid=1401743] As admins and assistant admins, we're doing our jobs by looking over other people's edits and giving tips for improvement, for the sake of CP.
Also, you need to become more communicative. I asked you what I think are simple questions, which I am asking because I want your response, with no malevolent intentions. For example, as I asked above, I was curious as to why >95% of your edits were marked as "minor" (something which is very unusual, but by no means damning). However, right after I asked, you posted [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Campaign_to_make_Conservapedia_unusable&oldid=1407757 this], which does nothing to help in any way. I didn't even ask you to give your explanation of the DoD server (which probably has a simple and satisfactory answer, but which still puzzles us).
We all appreciate your work here, and contrary to what you've claimed, we're acting reasonably when we scrutinize them and massage you. However, you should read [[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Teamwork]] and improve your attitude on this site. Thanks. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 09:58, 12 March 2018 (EDT)