Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,910
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 163:
Line 163: − == Conservative == − This what conservative posted on Flippin's talk page "No, fuck off. Don't like it? Get out. Complain again and you're banned for a week. Conservative 12:41, 1 May 2007 (EDT)" Conservapedia cannot have it's sysops using swear words. It makes this site looke bad. Plus if he doesn't get banned, then it shows how the sysops are above the rest and can get away with anything and they don't have to obey the rules on conservapedia. If this was any other user he would be banned permanently. --'''<font color="DarkGreen">Adrian</font><font color="Yellow">[[User talk:AdrianP|P]]</font>''' 12:48, 1 May 2007 (EDT) − :I am trying to deal with the situation but it's hard when it pops up every 2 seconds that I have new messages when I don't. I can't ignore it because there might be actual new messages. [[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:11, 1 May 2007 (EDT) − :: Look at the above user's contributions. Neither he nor 'conservative' are the real ones. --<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Wik</font><font color="#444444" face="Times New Roman">i</font><font color="#666666" face="Times New Roman">nterpreter</font>'''<sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter talk?]</sup> − :::Its a good thing your here, otherwise they would never have figured it out :). I still bet they won't understand for a while....[[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 13:14, 1 May 2007 (EDT) − The [[Visigoths]] are at the gates, and the [[Romans]] are asleep. And so it goes...[[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 13:36, 1 May 2007 (EDT) − − Restored from fake Asc.'s edits: − 'Whoah - what a scam! Look at the "new User" Log: http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log - Check out - '''New user''': "Conservative" - look at the "o" following the capital C - it is smaller than normal, a sub-font - this is a fake account to spoof the real conservative. Also '''new user''': Aschlafly (!!!) look at the small "a" it is also a sub-font.. a spoof Aschlafly account - webmaster, where are you ???? --[[User:Tim Smith|Tim Smith]] 13:32, 1 May 2007 (EDT)'
Conservapedia:Sysop complaint documentation (view source)
Revision as of 23:23, May 2, 2007
, 23:23, May 2, 2007→Conservative: this tempest in a teapot is over
I'm not going to comment. The environment here is too hostile, and again I fear I will be interpreted. Instead, I think this afternoon when I get a chance, I'll write an article for [[justice]] and get off the 90/10 list, and be proactive instead of defensive. [[User:Sterile|Sterile]] 08:33, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
I'm not going to comment. The environment here is too hostile, and again I fear I will be interpreted. Instead, I think this afternoon when I get a chance, I'll write an article for [[justice]] and get off the 90/10 list, and be proactive instead of defensive. [[User:Sterile|Sterile]] 08:33, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
== Ed Poor ==
== Ed Poor ==
This is what Ed Poor wrote in a debate page "We should just blast you all into smithereens, you humorless bastards! BOO-WAH-HAH-HAH!!!! --Ed Poor 14:25, 2 May 2007 (EDT)" Doesn't this warrant a ban? Or can I say bastard without getting into trouble? --[[User:FredK|FredK]] 14:53, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
This is what Ed Poor wrote in a debate page "We should just blast you all into smithereens, you humorless bastards! BOO-WAH-HAH-HAH!!!! --Ed Poor 14:25, 2 May 2007 (EDT)" Doesn't this warrant a ban? Or can I say bastard without getting into trouble? --[[User:FredK|FredK]] 14:53, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
: If I interpret 'BOO-WAH-HAH-HAH!!!!' correctly, as evil laughter, then it would seem to mitigate. Anyway, [[User:RSchlafly]] swore [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3ASigmund_Freud&diff=133574&oldid=133325 here] to no repercussions, so it would seem that it is condoned. --<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Wik</font><font color="#444444" face="Times New Roman">i</font><font color="#666666" face="Times New Roman">nterpreter</font>'''<sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter talk?]</sup>
: If I interpret 'BOO-WAH-HAH-HAH!!!!' correctly, as evil laughter, then it would seem to mitigate. Anyway, [[User:RSchlafly]] swore [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3ASigmund_Freud&diff=133574&oldid=133325 here] to no repercussions, so it would seem that it is condoned. --<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Wik</font><font color="#444444" face="Times New Roman">i</font><font color="#666666" face="Times New Roman">nterpreter</font>'''<sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter talk?]</sup>