Changes

|accessdate=2 January 2016

|accessdate=2 January 2016

}}</ref>

}}</ref>

Tragically, the so-called ‘LGBTI people’ and their countless supporters are victims of the ubiquitous ideomotor effect. In line with the [[ABC theory of emotion]], these [[Natural somnambulism#LGBTI somnambulism|LGBTI somnambulists]] remain steadfast in their [[belief]]s, rejecting the idea that verbose expressions of being ''‘born that way’'' are nothing more than their projected [[fantasy]]{{#tag:ref|cf. Campaigners [for so called "Same-sex marriages"] have been using the language of rights in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires.<ref>{{cite web |title=Gay marriage is not a 'human right': European ruling torpedoes Coalition stance |author=Steve Doughty |publisher=The Daily Mail |date=20 March 2012 |url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2117920/Gay-marriage-human-right-European-ruling-torpedoes-Coalition-stance.html |quote=Norman Wells, of the Family Education Trust, said: ‘For too long campaigners have been using the language of rights in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires. ‘In many cases they have bypassed the democratic process and succeeded in [[gleichschaltung|imposing their views on the rest of the population]] by force of law. ‘We are seeing the same principle at work in the Government’s sham of a consultation on same-sex marriage.’ He added: ‘The ruling from the ECHR will embolden those whose concerns about same-sex marriage and adoption are not inspired by personal hatred and animosity, but by a genuine concern for the well-being of children and the welfare of society. ‘Instead of rushing to legislate without seriously considering the views of the electorate, the Government should be encouraging a measured public debate on the nature and meaning of marriage.’}}</ref>|group=note}}, authored by their own subconscious and fueled by [[Gay activism|gay propagandists]].<ref name="Lively2009"/> When dwelling on the thought of [[same-sex attraction]], particularly in the context of society where people have been hoodwinked that 'you could be born that way,' the resulting [[Sexual disorientation|confusion about homosexual thoughts]] or tendencies could manifest itself as reality.<ref>{{cite book |title=Gay Marriage:right or wrong? And who decides? |author=Gary Bates and Lita Cosner |publisher=Creation Book Publishers |location=Powder Springs, GA, USA |year=2013 |pages=18 |isbn=978-1921-643750|url=http://creation.com/gay-marriage-right-or-wrong}}</ref>

Tragically, the so-called ‘LGBTI people’ and their countless supporters are victims of the ubiquitous ideomotor effect. In line with the [[ABC theory of emotion]], these [[Natural somnambulism#LGBTI somnambulism|LGBTI somnambulists]] remain steadfast in their [[belief]]s, rejecting the idea that verbose expressions of being ''‘born that way’'' are nothing more than their projected [[fantasy]]{{#tag:ref|cf. Campaigners [for so called "Same-sex marriages"] have been using the language of rights in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires.<ref>{{cite web |title=Gay marriage is not a 'human right': European ruling torpedoes Coalition stance |author=Steve Doughty |publisher=The Daily Mail |date=20 March 2012 |url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2117920/Gay-marriage-human-right-European-ruling-torpedoes-Coalition-stance.html |quote=Norman Wells, of the Family Education Trust, said: ‘For too long campaigners have been using the language of rights in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires. ‘In many cases they have bypassed the democratic process and succeeded in [[gleichschaltung|imposing their views on the rest of the population]] by force of law. ‘We are seeing the same principle at work in the Government’s sham of a consultation on same-sex marriage.’ He added: ‘The ruling from the ECHR will embolden those whose concerns about same-sex marriage and adoption are not inspired by personal hatred and animosity, but by a genuine concern for the well-being of children and the welfare of society. ‘Instead of rushing to legislate without seriously considering the views of the electorate, the Government should be encouraging a measured public debate on the nature and meaning of marriage.’}}</ref>|group=note}}, authored by their own subconscious and fueled by [[Gay activism|gay propagandists]].<ref name="Lively2009"/><ref>{{cite book |title=The Health Hazards of Homosexuality |author=Brian Camenker et al. |publisher=CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform |year=2017 |chapter=1: Sexual Orientation, The "Born Gay" Myth, and Population Estimates |pages=23+ |isbn=9781539983811  |url=http://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/homosexuality-health-book/paperback-here.html |quote=The "Born Gay" Myth ... The propaganda blueprint for the homosexual movement, ''[[After the Ball]]: How America will conquer its fear & hatred of Gays in the 90s'', makes a powerful admission that homosexuals are ''not'' "born that way." ... The public has been largely taken in by the "born gay" myth.}}</ref> When dwelling on the thought of [[same-sex attraction]], particularly in the context of society where people have been hoodwinked that 'you could be born that way,' the resulting [[Sexual disorientation|confusion about homosexual thoughts]] or tendencies could manifest itself as reality.<ref>{{cite book |title=Gay Marriage:right or wrong? And who decides? |author=Gary Bates and Lita Cosner |publisher=Creation Book Publishers |location=Powder Springs, GA, USA |year=2013 |pages=18 |isbn=978-1921-643750|url=http://creation.com/gay-marriage-right-or-wrong}}</ref>

==Notes==

==Notes==