SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,401
edits
Changes
no edit summary
Can someone please explain to me the logic behind that way of thinking, please? Because I'm lost. --[[User:James Kardys|James Kardys]] ([[User talk:James Kardys|talk]]) 23:59, 21 April 2018 (EDT)
Can someone please explain to me the logic behind that way of thinking, please? Because I'm lost. --[[User:James Kardys|James Kardys]] ([[User talk:James Kardys|talk]]) 23:59, 21 April 2018 (EDT)
:Put the crack pipe down. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 00:02, 22 April 2018 (EDT)
:Put the crack pipe down. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 00:02, 22 April 2018 (EDT)
::Okay, then. Tell me. If and when the EU forces all of its members to have their armies integrated into one fighting force that '''will''' be used to make sure those members lose their sovereignty for good and are '''never''' able to break free from the psychotic tyranny that is the Brussels-Berlin axis, how should America respond?
::Should it do nothing as its sphere of influence in Europe is rapidly destroyed, and a globalist European superstate that is powerful enough to threaten America's sphere of influence in its own backyard enters the world stage? Should it attempt to peacefully co-exist with that globalist European superstate?
::Should it celebrate the formation of that globalist European superstate because it means we would no longer have an obligation to protect Europe?
::Should it resort to economic or diplomatic action in hope that this globalist European superstate could be successfully contained like the USSR?
::What ought America do in the event of something that would be the worst nightmare of many anti-globalists, especially those in Europe? --[[User:James Kardys|James Kardys]] ([[User talk:James Kardys|talk]]) 00:40, 21 April 2018 (EDT)