23
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: +
will be more respectful in the future
{{welcome}}
{{welcome}}
:Many of your edits still read like they favor evolution, and many of the others simply look unnecessary. If someone wants to read the "mainstream" evolutionist perspective, they can simply go to the 95%-or-so of the websites that discuss these topics. As a Christian-conservative wiki, we discuss these topics from that standpoint, and many of your edits don't seem to follow that standard. Please remember that for the future, and regardless, thanks for your edits. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:44, 24 April 2018 (EDT)
:Many of your edits still read like they favor evolution, and many of the others simply look unnecessary. If someone wants to read the "mainstream" evolutionist perspective, they can simply go to the 95%-or-so of the websites that discuss these topics. As a Christian-conservative wiki, we discuss these topics from that standpoint, and many of your edits don't seem to follow that standard. Please remember that for the future, and regardless, thanks for your edits. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:44, 24 April 2018 (EDT)
::Ok, I'll try to tone it down in the future. My goal here is mostly to make sure that refutations of evolution, etc. accurately represent what they're refuting. I do plan to continue editing sections related to these topics, but I will try not to contradict the tone of Conservapedia. Thank you very much for your advice, it means a lot.--[[User:Cetacean|Cetacean]] ([[User talk:Cetacean|talk]]) 23:50, 24 April 2018 (EDT)