Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
843 bytes added ,  15:48, May 3, 2007
thanks!
Line 149: Line 149:     
:I believe that it's you that's assuming your conclusion.  You've not even bothered to explain why the sources are supposedly "biased niche-sources" and opposing sources are not, and why the sources are not "serious".  Making those assertions without something to back it up is not a valid argument.  And you are sort of wrong with the "biased niche-sources" anyway.  The creationist sources referenced frequently cite from non-creationist sources.  So what that you've taken science classes?  So have the scientists who are creationists!  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:45, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
 
:I believe that it's you that's assuming your conclusion.  You've not even bothered to explain why the sources are supposedly "biased niche-sources" and opposing sources are not, and why the sources are not "serious".  Making those assertions without something to back it up is not a valid argument.  And you are sort of wrong with the "biased niche-sources" anyway.  The creationist sources referenced frequently cite from non-creationist sources.  So what that you've taken science classes?  So have the scientists who are creationists!  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:45, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== thanks! ==
 +
 +
Phil, thanks for clarifying the Mokele-member part of the story.  (I'm not a big fan on bulleted lists--it makes it look like the writer is just trying to occupy more space--but that's your stylistic choice.)
 +
 +
The only other true objection (well, at least that I will bring up) is that the "exctinct species that were found" argument.  An analogous argument is that apples provide evidence for oranges.  That is, there's nothing about pine trees, squirrels or fish that provide any evidence for dinosaurs, because they are not related. Certainly you would say that birds do not provide evidence for dinosaurs (!), so why would squirrels or fish or pine trees?
 +
 +
Other than that, I think you have portrayed the creationist perspective as well as it will ever be done.  Cheerio!  [[User:Sterile|Sterile]] 11:48, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
408

edits

Navigation menu