| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| | * It's also true as far as other sources tell me that other books than Galileo's dealing with Copernican theories were added to the Index of Forbidden Books. Galileo's theories were denounced from the pulpit and to the Medici by the Dominicans, so I don't understand why that should have been taken out in his edit. | | * It's also true as far as other sources tell me that other books than Galileo's dealing with Copernican theories were added to the Index of Forbidden Books. Galileo's theories were denounced from the pulpit and to the Medici by the Dominicans, so I don't understand why that should have been taken out in his edit. |
| | * I also think the point about Galileo's work, however inaccurate in some respects by modern standards, being the first commonly-accepted example of the use of the scientific method of hypothesis, experiment, observation and falsifiability is quite central, and can't understand why this should have been removed in RSchlafly's edit. Please can we discuss these before any further edits are made.--[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 15:12, 3 May 2007 (EDT) | | * I also think the point about Galileo's work, however inaccurate in some respects by modern standards, being the first commonly-accepted example of the use of the scientific method of hypothesis, experiment, observation and falsifiability is quite central, and can't understand why this should have been removed in RSchlafly's edit. Please can we discuss these before any further edits are made.--[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 15:12, 3 May 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | : Saying that the book was burned implies that the only copy was lost. It was not. Copies were readily available to other scholars. |
| | + | : The Bible was just one of many reasons for thinking that the Earth was at the center. Any statement that it was the only reason, or even the main reason, is just wrong. |
| | + | : It is okay to say what was being banned or denounced, as long as it says what was really being banned or denounced. |
| | + | : The idea that Galileo invented the scientific method is just nonsense. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 15:31, 3 May 2007 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| | He thinks it's anti-Catholic, but it's also factual... I checked the sources and did my own research. Is that how it works on Conservapedia? Censor the unpleasant stuff?-[[User:BillBuck|BillBuck]] 15:23, 3 May 2007 (EDT) | | He thinks it's anti-Catholic, but it's also factual... I checked the sources and did my own research. Is that how it works on Conservapedia? Censor the unpleasant stuff?-[[User:BillBuck|BillBuck]] 15:23, 3 May 2007 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| | :::You bet it is. Check out the history of the McCarthy article. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 15:24, 3 May 2007 (EDT) | | :::You bet it is. Check out the history of the McCarthy article. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 15:24, 3 May 2007 (EDT) |