790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 108:
Line 108: +
→literacy?
:Er, most people aren't persnickity enough to bring it up, but since you're (not the contraction, ahem) going to equate people talking about your typing with proof that you have issues... well, ok, I'll complain. In your two sentences above, one is fine but one is badly mangled. To wit - no leading capitalization, "your", multiple ending punctuation. Your first comment in this section is also quite bad.
:Er, most people aren't persnickity enough to bring it up, but since you're (not the contraction, ahem) going to equate people talking about your typing with proof that you have issues... well, ok, I'll complain. In your two sentences above, one is fine but one is badly mangled. To wit - no leading capitalization, "your", multiple ending punctuation. Your first comment in this section is also quite bad.
:My apologies for butting in, Jeremiah, I'm just browsing the "Recent changes." [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 16:25, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
:My apologies for butting in, Jeremiah, I'm just browsing the "Recent changes." [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 16:25, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
:: Mine too. Jer., maybe it was a bit harsh what you said, but Will N., it was in reference to Sysopship, which generally requires people to type in Standard English (not saying you can't, just that you don't). I personally grate every time I see Aschlafly's multiple exclamation marks, but they're tolerable. Close, but tolerable :-). Will, 1 <0u1d 7yp3 3|\|71r31y 1|\| 1337, but I think it would grate with other readers. --<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Wik</font><font color="#444444" face="Times New Roman">i</font><font color="#666666" face="Times New Roman">nterpreter</font>'''<sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter talk?]</sup>