Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
340 bytes added ,  21:20, May 3, 2007
Line 54: Line 54:  
It is a respectable book, and seems like a good source to me. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 16:28, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
 
It is a respectable book, and seems like a good source to me. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 16:28, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
 
::i think he thought the citation was the book review on amazon.com which it links to, not the book.  I was going to add it back.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
 
::i think he thought the citation was the book review on amazon.com which it links to, not the book.  I was going to add it back.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
 +
:::That’s exactly why I removed it, a link to an amazon.com page about a book is not a good way to support a claim—a cite to the book (along with a page number) would be fine, or a link to a page which actually has the claim on it.  But, as it stood the link did not support the claim.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 17:20, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
553

edits

Navigation menu