Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
reply
Line 206: Line 206:  
I mean that he doesn't care what other people have to say.  And blocks them when they disagree with him.  I mean, you've been here longer than me, so prove me wrong, but first impressions are really hard to shake, you know?-[[User:BillBuck|BillBuck]] 19:26, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
 
I mean that he doesn't care what other people have to say.  And blocks them when they disagree with him.  I mean, you've been here longer than me, so prove me wrong, but first impressions are really hard to shake, you know?-[[User:BillBuck|BillBuck]] 19:26, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
   −
Ultimately, you're going to find it difficult to go up against [[User:Aschlafly|our Supreme Leader]]. I'd back the 'mister nice guy' approach, and just back down, I'm afraid, instead joining the difficult quest of help to create a good environment here. Trying to take him on here will just mean another person blocked. --<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Wik</font><font color="#444444" face="Times New Roman">i</font><font color="#666666" face="Times New Roman">nterpreter</font>'''<sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter talk?]</sup>
+
: I appreciate the support here.  It's obvious to me that Bill is yet another liberal who may delight in pretending otherwise.  Bill, I'm going to check your edits now but if you're violating the 90/10 [[rule]] and don't correct that violation soon, then you will be blocked as others have been.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:34, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794

edits

Navigation menu