SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 690:
Line 690: + + + + + + + +
→John McCain
:My apologies. I thought I'd help you appear to be a fair minded individual rather than standing by Democrat race baiting and hypocrisy. Again, my apologies. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 04:16, 27 May 2018 (EDT)
:My apologies. I thought I'd help you appear to be a fair minded individual rather than standing by Democrat race baiting and hypocrisy. Again, my apologies. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 04:16, 27 May 2018 (EDT)
::Well, I thank you for your offer of help in keeping my talk page free of race baiting and hypocrisy. But I think the amount of race baiting that I do (zero) is just right. I'll be really careful not to engage in race baiting in the future. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 11:40, 27 May 2018 (EDT)
::Well, I thank you for your offer of help in keeping my talk page free of race baiting and hypocrisy. But I think the amount of race baiting that I do (zero) is just right. I'll be really careful not to engage in race baiting in the future. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 11:40, 27 May 2018 (EDT)
Rob's finding that I engaged in race-baiting in the John McCain tribute on my user page piqued my curiosity. I wondered "What is RobSmith's writing actually like?" I hadn't read any of it in many months, since he has lately been engaging in manic editing sprees that would put [[User:Conservative]] to shame. And the edit comments and article titles indicate that the edits must be rubbish on a par with Cons's writing. Worse than, for example [[Atheists_and_physical_attractiveness]]? Hard to say. I'd have to read that stuff.
So I picked one of Rob's edits at random: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Trump_transition&diff=1425318&oldid=1425317 this one]. He essentially added "... as millions of misogynist white women went to the polls on election day ..." to the Trump transition article. Huh?? In an ''encyclopedia''? One that prides itself on being trustworthy?
That edit was one of 211 edits, over a 30 hour period with just 3 breaks, of less than 5, 4, and 2 hours. That's the sort of thing that Rob considers worth spending his time on? By contrast, Cons made only 10 edits in that same time frame. Cons still has a long way to go, be he's making progress.
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:22, 31 May 2018 (EDT)
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}