Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
846 bytes removed ,  03:01, May 4, 2007
andy stepped in
Line 193: Line 193:  
I think now that what the theory of evolution is has now been adequately explained. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 01:18, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
 
I think now that what the theory of evolution is has now been adequately explained. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 01:18, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:Glad you think that, but it's still not a good definition. <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 01:31, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:Glad you think that, but it's still not a good definition. <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 01:31, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
  −
== SYSOP ColinR made a ideological edit to the [[astronomy]] article. ==
  −
  −
SYSOP ColinR made a ideological edit to the [[astronomy]] article.  I deleted the material that stated that is was a fact that the universe was billions of years old in the [[Astronomy]] article as it is not a fact and breaks a conservapedia rule.  I put in the young earth creationists views and nowhere did I state they were fact.  Thus, I complied with the conservapedia commandments.  Sysop ColinR removed the young earth creationist material and put in the "it is a fact that the universe is old" material.  Therefore, I charge ColinR with breaking a conservapedia commandment and committing a ideaological edit.  I wish the conservapedia panel to render a decision on this matter and thus avoid a edit war.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:53, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
 
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,824

edits

Navigation menu