nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 44:
Line 44: +
→Cenozoic/cainozoic: American spelling not required
:::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:53, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
:::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:53, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
Not sure I was trying to put together a "rebuttal", I thought I was replying to "cheek". Anyway, interestingly enough, in your proofs you determined what this site should call it: "called Cenozoic in the USA". Non American spelling have been approved for articles that are commonwealth-centric. Either way, as long as the table develops, adds the time periods involved, I don't really care either way. By the way, googling "cenozoic" gets hit #2 at berkeley; #3 paleos.com, followed by a whole string of .edu's. Cainozoic gets an au site, followed by two 100 year old refs, and yet another cite to "see cenozoic". Whatever... [[User:Human|Human]] 00:32, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
Not sure I was trying to put together a "rebuttal", I thought I was replying to "cheek". Anyway, interestingly enough, in your proofs you determined what this site should call it: "called Cenozoic in the USA". Non American spelling have been approved for articles that are commonwealth-centric. Either way, as long as the table develops, adds the time periods involved, I don't really care either way. By the way, googling "cenozoic" gets hit #2 at berkeley; #3 paleos.com, followed by a whole string of .edu's. Cainozoic gets an au site, followed by two 100 year old refs, and yet another cite to "see cenozoic". Whatever... [[User:Human|Human]] 00:32, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
:The spelling requirements have been eased, and there is no requirement to use American spellings simply because the article is not Commonwealth-centric. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:30, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
==Crazy Superscripts==
==Crazy Superscripts==