Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, rollback
7,537
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 158:
Line 158: +
→Copyright protection for intellectual property of the Islamic State
::Reuters had a reason to put a copyright watermark on this photograph. You claimed that the photo can be used by the CC 4.0 licence which is definitely wrong. There had been a lot of copyright complaints on several images on many websites, so please do not upload images with a copyright watermark without permission.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 15:18, 10 June 2018 (EDT)
::Reuters had a reason to put a copyright watermark on this photograph. You claimed that the photo can be used by the CC 4.0 licence which is definitely wrong. There had been a lot of copyright complaints on several images on many websites, so please do not upload images with a copyright watermark without permission.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 15:18, 10 June 2018 (EDT)
:::Let me understand what you are saying: Reuters exerted copyrights over intellectual property produced by the Islamic State. Is that correct? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 17:05, 12 June 2018 (EDT)
:::Let me understand what you are saying: Reuters exerted copyrights over intellectual property produced by the Islamic State. Is that correct? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 17:05, 12 June 2018 (EDT)
::::Reuters apparently got access to the footage early enough. Could you please tell me why it put a copyright watermark on the photograph?--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 17:12, 12 June 2018 (EDT)
== I moved the National Front article ==
== I moved the National Front article ==