Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Bell v. Blue Cross of California (view source)

Revision as of 04:57, July 1, 2018

338 bytes added ,  04:57, July 1, 2018
expanded further
Line 7: Line 7:  
''Bell v. Blue Cross of Cal.'', 131 Cal. App. 4th 211, 220, 31 Cal. Rptr. 3d 688, 695 (2005).   
 
''Bell v. Blue Cross of Cal.'', 131 Cal. App. 4th 211, 220, 31 Cal. Rptr. 3d 688, 695 (2005).   
 
[[category:Health Care]]
 
[[category:Health Care]]
 +
 +
Put another way, section 1371.4 of the Knox-Keene Act requires an insurer to reimburse a reasonable sum, not "any amount it chooses, no matter how little," and the reasonableness of that reimbursement can be determined in court. ''Bell v. Blue Cross of California'', 131 Cal. App. 4th 211, 214, 217-18, 222, 31 Cal. Rptr. 3d 688 (2005).
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,551

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1431140"

Navigation menu