Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,340
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 30:
Line 30: − +
→Immunity deal
Waldman contacted Associate Deputy Attorney General [[Bruce Ohr]]. They met in [[Washington DC]] on February 3, 3017. Within 24 hours of the Ohr meeting, Waldman contacted Deputy Assistant Attorney General in charge of [[counterintelligence]] [[David Laufman]] of the National Security Division.
Waldman contacted Associate Deputy Attorney General [[Bruce Ohr]]. They met in [[Washington DC]] on February 3, 3017. Within 24 hours of the Ohr meeting, Waldman contacted Deputy Assistant Attorney General in charge of [[counterintelligence]] [[David Laufman]] of the National Security Division.
Assange made clear through that he would never compromise his sources, or stop publishing information, but was willing to consider concessions like redactions. This was viewed as a positive sign by members of the US [[intelligence community]], if not as a means of neutralizing or stopping WikiLeaks, but at least controlling it.
Assange made clear through that he would never compromise his sources, or stop publishing information, but was willing to consider concessions, like redactions or "risk mitigation." This was viewed as a positive sign by members of the US [[intelligence community]], if not as a means of neutralizing or stopping WikiLeaks, but at least controlling it.
A few days after the negotiations opened in mid-February, Waldman reached out to Democratic Sen. [[Mark Warner]]; Waldman wanted to see if the Senate Intelligence Committee wanted any contact with Assange to ask about Russia or other issues.
A few days after the negotiations opened in mid-February, Waldman reached out to Democratic Sen. [[Mark Warner]]; Waldman wanted to see if the Senate Intelligence Committee wanted any contact with Assange to ask about Russia or other issues.