Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
add cite later
Line 1: Line 1:  
Over 100,000 page edits on Conservapedia provides much data to study and analyze [[liberal behavior]] and trends.  Several important characteristics emerge:
 
Over 100,000 page edits on Conservapedia provides much data to study and analyze [[liberal behavior]] and trends.  Several important characteristics emerge:
    +
# Name-calling, particularly as a [[Parthian shot]], is overused by liberals.  In one recent exchange, a critic finished his remarks with "you've just conceded that you are a deceitful liar.  Thanks, that's all I needed to know."
 
# Almost no liberal admits he's liberal, or that he holds a liberal belief, or that he is using a liberal argument.  More often a liberal will claim to be a conservative, and try to make a liberal argument sound better with the preface, "Well, I'm a conservative, but I support gun control!"  But why are so many people embarrassed to admit they are liberal???
 
# Almost no liberal admits he's liberal, or that he holds a liberal belief, or that he is using a liberal argument.  More often a liberal will claim to be a conservative, and try to make a liberal argument sound better with the preface, "Well, I'm a conservative, but I support gun control!"  But why are so many people embarrassed to admit they are liberal???
 
# An enjoyment and tolerance of deceit.  Liberal editors almost never criticized deceitful behavior as being "wrong".  Liberals generally reject the [[Ten Commandments]], and oppose teaching them to children.  Often liberal editors have defended or applauded deceitful behavior here.  This is remniscent of [[Wikipedia]] co-founder Jimmy Wales offering Essjay a position ''after'' his misrepresentations were disclosed, until public criticism compelled Wales to change his mind.
 
# An enjoyment and tolerance of deceit.  Liberal editors almost never criticized deceitful behavior as being "wrong".  Liberals generally reject the [[Ten Commandments]], and oppose teaching them to children.  Often liberal editors have defended or applauded deceitful behavior here.  This is remniscent of [[Wikipedia]] co-founder Jimmy Wales offering Essjay a position ''after'' his misrepresentations were disclosed, until public criticism compelled Wales to change his mind.
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795

edits

Navigation menu